SM expose'

[HEYDUDE]

Hi Michel

I suspect Tesla, Stubblefield and all the big ones to be indigo child or indigo adults.

Apparently I am one of those.

We welcome special persons to the forum. Perhaps it will be much easier for such persons as yourself to crack the mystery of the TPU and other "vaporous technology" persued here.

Please do not tarnish someone or something you do not comprehend. The TPU and foremost the Stubblefield cell have deep underlying concepts that are even today not achieve by normal science.

No one wants to tarnish anything. SM will write his own legacy by his actions. Compare his actions with Faraday.
Also, kindly do not presume to know what I do and do not comprehend.

We would be grateful if you could explain to us these deep underlying concepts that are "even today not achieved by normal science"

As a matter of fact, they have not been achieved  outside of "normal science" either.

If you have other information we would be grateful if you would post a clear, concise, proof of concept, with pictures and experimental proofs of same in a pdf thesis document. We can have other "indigos" peer revue your work. No pseudoscience gobbledegook, please. Enough of that on the forum.

And heydude, Thanks in advance for your input and welcome.

There are many ways to skin a cat

p.s. lets not "skin" any more "cats" lest the "animal cruelty prevention people" shut down the forum.

[powerunlimited]

To all;a thought crossed my mind,what if Steven Mark has been on this forum
since the first videos were released I believe 2006 and is one of the members that have been around since  2006.
What a perfect way to sabotage any effort to deplicate the tpu and create massive misdirection.
Just a thought I have no proof for or against this theory,just something to keep in mind.

Just another thought, people constantly point out things such the lamps in the video possibly having batteries
or the base of the big tpu and other things.The video was to hook the investor's greed,the investor would not drop a penny without checking
a lot of things such as bringing there own voltmeters,light bulbs and engineer, these kind of people are greedy scumbags and don't trust anyone.
Jack Durban stated that they thought(investors engineers) it might be radiated power from a hidden transmitter so they did
tests to check this,it passed the test,Jack was a wealth of information.Jack Durban also said that tests were done on the hood of a car far from
Steven Marks home and the tpu worked fine.

[Mannix]

Some fodder for the screaming children

Some things we do and believe today
May seem irrational in hindsight tomorrow
But still we do and believe them
The challenge is to move trrough them with grace
Those who feel more comfortable with their hads upon the gallows lever
have differnt things to learn, and different ways of learning them.

we all have our misgivings as we do gifts.

So go on, scream. I'm completely done with this thread

[HEYDUDE]

Dear Lindsay Mannix

I'm sorry that you feel that way. I for one would like to get a better sense of the events surrounding the SM mystery. You hold the key to this and have the ability to clarify a few things for which we would all be grateful.

So I will pose a few simple questions and hope that you will respond in a gentlemanly manner.

You posted reports of Dr. Schinzinger who supposedly tested two of SM's units and the engineer who commented on the impossibility of batteries being used.

These reports seem credible in the reading and are key to establishing authenticity of the devices presented by SM.

1. In what format did you receive Dr. Schinzingers lab reports or the engineers report?
2. Do you have in your possession a copy of Dr. Schinzinger lab reports or the engineers report that was faxed or mailed to you, or sent in some other electronic manner that preserved integrity of the document?
3. Are the reports signed by their authors?
4. Did you type these reports into a post on OU, leaving out header and footer information?

These are reasonable questions asked, hoping they can be answered to put this issue to rest.

Powerunlimited mentioned that the devices could have been energized by hidden RF field. I do not believe this is
possible considering the 800 watts or so of power in the case of the SM17.

In the case of the smaller units maybe, but toroidal loop antennas are fairly directional and the bulb would have wavered as the toroid was moved off axis.

There are other ways to fake this, but I don't think RF was used. I would like to believe the SM17 was real.

Thanks for your consideration of these questions.

[powerunlimited]

@heydude I might not have expained what I said correctly sorry,it was thought at that time that it  was radiated rf power
from a hidden transmitter,it was found that there was no radiated rf power,so that wasn't the source of the power it generates.
I don't believe for one moment that radiated rf power from a hidden transmitter is the source of the tpu's power or it contained batteries
to create the power,maybe one only to start it up,the source of the power is something totally different
and unknown.