Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



New catalyst found

Started by ln2, August 06, 2008, 08:52:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

christo4_99

Quote from: retroworm on August 06, 2008, 02:25:50 PM
My personal opinion is that out of current methods, flow batteries (e.g. vanadium redox) are the best option for average home power station. They don't have the inneficiencies that electrolyzers/fuel cells have and they are safe to store, and don't degrade like conventional batteries. To my knowledge their capacity is well comparable to hydrogen tanks as well. All the technology is there, but there's lack of manufacturers.
correct me if i'm wrong...batteries are just getting smaller...(i)/we are concerned with energy sources moreso than ways to store it

retroworm

This thread is about storing energy. If we can't find workin OU device over here, sun is the next best thing we have. But sun doesn't always shine so you'll have to buffer some energy to keep going. Even at their finest, conventional batteries cannot compete with chemical fuels in energy density or cost. They are expensive, and degrade over time. I may seem negative here, but my gripe is that MIT is quick to make bold claims without showing anything concrete, and even if they reach that magic 100% input efficiency they still lose to flow batteries in safety, energy density per volume, output efficiency and probably initial cost.