Can someone confirm this in FEMM?

[lumen]

The interesting thing with this configuration, is none of the magnets need to be moved, they all move themselves.
In step #1, the pivot magnet pulls itself into the configuration.
In step #2, the sliding magnet slides itself to the right and into a position that now pushes away the pivot magnet.
In step #3, the pivot magnet is now pushed away from the configuration because of the previous movement of the sliding magnet.

Then after step #3, if the polarity is reversed on the pivot magnet and the pivot point moved over a bit, it will again pull itself into the configuration to perform the entire sequence over again but in reverse.

I'm not sure how this could be true, but I think it couldn't hurt to look into this a bit further to determine why these results.

[jonifer]

Some rule for megnet motor (overunity too)
- the distance between the magnets does not change by more 1 mm
in right motor you can get 1000000 more power with same magnet.

[0c]

Some rule for megnet motor (overunity too)
- the distance between the magnets does not change by more 1 mm
in right motor you can get 1000000 more power with same magnet.

True, but cogging / sticky spots will increase by the same factor. Definitely a consideration.

[broli]

Thanks lumen now I see what's supposed to happen.

I have a question. Does FEMM indicate all this forces when you run through all these steps?

[lumen]

@Broli, FEMM can show data several different ways but I only required the XY force data.
I posted three txt files that contain the XY force data for every step in each of the three moves made.
The blank lines indicate when the next move starts.