I want a Newman machine

[Michelinho]

Hi willitwork,

Most physicists are unaware that Einstein's famous equation was originally written by Einstein as EL = mc^2.

http://www.josephnewman.com/Einsteins_Equation.html

The rest is in his book. The speed of light in a coil. High voltage.

Take care,

Michel

[sirmikey1]

Cafe,
  this guy is using solar to power home and car. 
Huge initial investment, but he is off the grid. 


solar & hydrogen combo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEdQRVQtffw

SM 

[cafeinst]

Dear Nomen luni,

You are correct to distinguish between skeptics and debunkers. Based upon my experience, the debunkers have had both a positive and a negative impact on progress. Debunking started out as a good thing, debunking paranormal stuff. Houdini was an example and the Amazing Randi has continued this tradition.

However, the debunkers have a tendency to go too far. There is a power of laugher and mocking, which is in the arsenal of the debunker. It is possible to metaphorically destroy demons by laughing at them. (I say metaphorically because they really don't exist, if anyone didn't know this.) However, it is also possible to destroy great ideas like the airplane by laughing at them too. The idea of an airplane was mocked for a few years even after the Wright brothers' flight. It took a lot of strength and fortitude on the part of the Wright brothers to ignore the mockers and do what they did.

[hartiberlin]

The NBS test report was a governmental scam as I have always said and
it was proven by numerours engineers, that the NBS did test the Newman machine
wrongly by shorting out and suppressing the BackEMF pulses, so
the batteries were not recharged and no electrical overunity energy was measured.

The NBS persons did not understand the machine.
That can be read in their test report and their
circuit diagram.
The main OU energy in the Newman machine
are in the Backcurrent spikes, which they did suppress.

The OU energy comes from the oxidation of the graphite from C to CO2
via the sparking and releasing these oxidation electrons into the
circuit to recharge the battery.
A dissimular metal electrode commutator is needed from
copper and graphite and the spark is the "electrolyte"-

This way the commutator forms a galvanic cell ( additional battery) which is
put into the cuircuit, so it recharges the main supply battery during the sparking
via this oxidation process.

As this is some kind of DIRECT CARBON CONVERSION to electrical
energy, it is very efficient.

NewmanÂÃ,´s explanations about gyroscopic particles and E= M x C^2
in this context is NOT the key factor.

It is the graphite oxidation process, which delivers free additional electrons into the
circuit and which charge up the supply batteries.

That is the whole secret of the Newman motors.

I have worked quite some time on this to understand it...

Regards, Stefan.

[Spirality]

... The main OU energy in the Newman machine
are in the Backcurrent spikes ...

The OU energy comes from the oxidation of the graphite from C to CO2
via the sparking and releasing these oxidation electrons into the
circuit to recharge the battery.
A dissimular metal electrode commutator is needed from
copper and graphite and the spark is the "electrolyte"-

This way the commutator forms a galvanic cell ( additional battery) which is
put into the cuircuit, so it recharges the main supply battery during the sparking
via this oxidation process.
...
It is the graphite oxidation process, which delivers free additional electrons into the
circuit and which charge up the supply batteries ...

Am I reading this right  ...
The materials of construction play an active part in the back emf process?
I know that when a spark jumps, it leaves a layer of Carbon on the contacts. Wouldn't this be enough by itself (on any material) to function as the source of the oxidating electrons (C to CO2) for the back emf?

I am going to imagine a commutator wheel made of graphite and a steel paper-clip as the springy part.
Is it right, does the back emf travel better FROM the graphite to the steel, or should it be the other way around?
Does this mean that a conductive axle should be used? I am trying to find one that isn't influenced by magnetism too much, such as brass or aluminium.
Is it the same graphite that is used in pencils? and if so, how would you stop it from wearing down so quickly on a commutator?

Thanks for reading,
I will understand a short answer, especially if I am barking up the wrong tree.