WFC Summary of Latest Tests

[professor]

Hi Gazza,
I feel for you, as I have gone through the same testing but using  less Math for the Inductors.
I have reached also the point of frustration, however looking at Dingle and Meyer, it seems to still keeps me going.
One thing I would like to try  is to take a Variable Capacitor as those from older type Radios and submerge it in Water.
Since the capacity in free air is known from this device and you now have an established reference I like to see what it's Capacity reading would be if it was submerged in Water and how much it changes from distilled to tap water of various kinds.
You said that you  read 1.5 Microfarad across the WC , this seems a little high since you insulated it. I was never able get an accurate reading from these multimeter testers but have to rely on them too as  I have no longer access to a LRC Tester that we had  at a Job years ago.
I have been insulating the outside of the outer tube and plugged the ends of the inner tube trying to eliminate as much stray electron flow and resistance.. 
After hours and days of  conditioning the Cell with various voltages and frequencies I found that my inner tube got coated with a dark brown substance giving the appearance of being burned.
I never achieved the white coating,using distilled ozonated water.
Got tired of loosing too many Mosfets so I am using a SCR solid state Relay and modulating its Optical Input and then feeding the output first going through a protective load into a bridge rectifier then to the WC.I know SCR's create a lot of Harmonics exactly what I was hoping for (Shotgun Effect)
I  later replaced the inner tube with a 9mm  Carbon Rod which appears to give me a better production than the SS tube despite the fact that the spacing had increased. Ideally I would like to have a Variable High Voltage Supply and Chop up a ripple free DC rather than going through a Stepup Transformer.
It should be easy to break down a  1.5 uf Cap  providing there is not much insulation.I think that spacing is very important and due to the size of tubes that are manufactured there is too much space  (4.3 mm) I like to see it to be 1mm.
I think I may continue with Plates as you can space them much easier.
However and here we go again,If meyers was ringing these Tubes by electrical and then mechanical resonance I would be waisting my Time  by using Plates.
One just never knows, there are just to many theories despite Meyers Patent , only which one ?
The thought also crossed my mind of using an Aluminum tube for the cathode as thus would create a half way rectifier and prevent  the current to flow back into your circuit. A diode unless you use a very high Voltage type is subject to breakdown. Using a  water rectifier this breakdown is maybe just what you need . Am I making sense? It's just a thought . I still have to find a suitable 6061T6  Tube to complete that part of the test.
Professor

quote author=gazzzwp link=topic=5409.msg121888#msg121888 date=1218989009]
I understand your thoughts HB, but what about DC resonance?  Until I came across Meyer's work, I myself had not heard of DC resonance.

At college my experience of resonance was only with AC.  This may well explain the difficulty that myself and others have had in replicating the effect.

Since writing my summary, I have read RAVI's latest technical summary.

Here it is if you have not seen it yet.

http://www.panaceauniversity.org/Ravi%20Cell.pdf

The technical precision that he recommends in order to construct a WFC is mind blowing, and is a bit like assembling a nuclear bomb!

Having acquired the correct grade of S/S, annealed the tubes, cut them with precision, connected the tubes as recommended, conditioned them........phew......then if you are lucky you may exeperience the mystical resonance and obtain a decent gas output.  Read on into the document and Ravi explains that for this effort, and with a lot more sweat and blood installing it in an ICE, you may get a 50% saving on gasoline useage.

This all sounds to me more and more like a questionable venture.  Unless someone can come up with something novel that requires less precision and preperation, the exercise to me is a none starter.  Sad to admit this after the work I have already put in but there it is.

I am all for alternative cheap energy, but to me this is not it.  I cannot believe that Stan Meyer's final design required this amount of technical precision.

Anyway good luck and best wishes to all, and I salute your efforts.

Gazza


[/quote]