Towards Realizing the TPU

[Grumpy]

So, how would we apply the ol' virtual photons to .99's work?

... or we could move it to the spherics thread and apply it to his tetrahedral device.

Keep in mind that a magnetic field, per Eric Dollard and Leedskalnin, is composed of two flows of virtual photons in opposite directions.  Per Wheatstones experiment with three spark gaps, we know that an electric current is also two flows of particles (everyone ignores the positron) in opposite directions.  Two flows of different velocity may be the same as two in the opposite direction and I think this is what SM was doing - perhaps both depending on which unit you look at.

Next question is how do you make virtual photons flow, or appear to flow?  If you just create a pulse, they move radially which is no good because we need to direct them.  How do we make them go the right direction?

In a conventional circuit the ppower source determines the direction. Be it a battery, power supply, or capacitor, they are all dipole sources with positive coming out one way and negative out the other.  So, it appears that we could "bias" our bifilar wires to give the photons a sense of direction.

[3decimal14]

I think this page has some interesting info regarding the TPU:

Scalar coil pulsing technique:
http://magnetism.otc.co.nz/Atoms.htm

/Tommy

[pauldude000]

@Grumpy

If you wish to directionalize a force, then you examine the direction of propagation, and design accordingly......

For instance, the whorls created in the "quantum foam" are at right angles to the direction of flow in the wire. These whorls, or vortices, tornadoes, etc.. (whatever term you like is fine) are by nature spin inducing currents, which would affect both spin and flow of all mass containers, or mass effect containers, whichever term you prefer.

Two devices would be needed to test for proper overall spin direction, which one would not even think of, as neither device normally associated with electronics....

A device to test for ratational torque on small scales (light turntable type device), and a good small postal type non-digital scale, or balance beam....... This should be in itself MORE than just a small hint at what I am getting at.

Look for inertial effects, scale of magnitude, and direction of force propogation. Rewind your coil if necessary to redirect the force to the desired angle.

E=mc^2, such a beautiful equation, and much handier now to me than I thought possible before.

Paul Andrulis 

[pauldude000]

@all

We are starting to swim in new uncharted water, so tread carefully.........

DO NOT, please do NOT, try what I stated earlier with Spherics device!!!!!!!! It just hit me why it reminds me of a force chamber!!

Some of the effects which SHOULD become apparent are gravitic in nature. Spherics device may well, if my imagination is working at all, create a localized gravitic distortion, somewhat controlled in nature. Call it a "gravity bottle" for want of a better term or description. The force of gravity is exponential by nature. At the periphery, the effect may be quite small, while at the center quite strong. If too strong, then packet structures of individual particles may well be forced to contact DESPITE natural spin repulsion and therefore rupture, and possibly restructure into new stable combinants.

What I am talking about is, again for want of a better term.... possibly complete PARTICLE (not simply atomic) fission then re-fusion. If controlled, then not a problem, except for possibly powerful variant flows. If control is lost during the process? (This scenario is not funny.)

Therein is probably the "overunity", of many electrical devices. The previous principle on an extremely small scale. Packet Energy Conversion, or PEC for short. A little goes a long way.

Paul Andrulis

[Grumpy]

Biasing is a good start.