Towards Realizing the TPU

[pauldude000]

Hello all,

@Paul

as we know we are pulsating our coils so please!!!! would you be so kind to make a 1 minute hand drawing so we can see what you mean?? The problem is that we have on 1 end of the coil pulses and on the other end a + or - connected.

Sorry, Im a little bit stupid, ha,ha.

And maybe other solutions?? Of course I also would love to know: are you talking about controls, collectors....

Otto

Otto, what I speak of is simple as breathing. Use ordinary plain lamp cord (or speaker wire... "zip-cord" of any style, which is heavy gauge, 2 conductor parallel with plastic insulation). Wrap your controls with this material.

Simple wire diagram below.

Twisted together at this end:
  ][
  ][
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|| ||
|| ||
+   -

+ = pulse input
- = Circuit ground

Use this as your controls. Whether you will need one control all the way around, or two controls, I don't yet know.

This would focus the effect "vortexes" into the collectors in the center. Pulsing this would in effect be the same in concept as having jumper cables hooked to a battery, then slapping the clamps against each other, except with much less current involved.

At the right frequency, the pulse will be in lock step with each other on the two wires, and the effect would be at maximum for that voltage/amperage combination.

However, if you use a sintered iron core.... you may get more than you are looking for. (I know you like TV yokes, but please try it first without one.)

Personally, I want to try one with a single control all the way around, and the same type of wire hookup for the collector as well, but hook the control and the collector in series, on a TV yoke...... (not looking with this experiment for electricity generation.......)

It would be interesting to try the amplification setup BEP gave, as an answer to a question from me, in the "steven marks tube amp" thread.....

Interesting indeed.

EDIT:

DO NOT CLOSE WIND the lamp cord, as it may kill the effect! leave a space between each winding.



Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

The more I think about this, the more everything starts making sense, and the more of SM's clues start adding up.

For instance, look at a bar magnet under a sheet of paper, using iron power or filings sprinkled on the top of the paper. The classic "look at the mag field" experiment.

Notice something. No "lines of force" coming from the center of the bar magnet. The only concentration of perpendicular "lines" are from the pole areas. (Aaaaggh! I hate the term "lines of force". Fits like a salvation army shoe reject. They are only "lines" when viewed in flatland.)

Now, remember SM's toroid "jitter" when it moved? (He wasn't wearing a parka, so obviously wasn't even close to either magnetic pole of the earth.) Hint... The TPU wasn't "cutting" any "lines of force", which were PARALLEL to his TPU unit during the demonstration.

What, I ask therefore, was causing the TPU to have a case of the "jitters"?



Paul Andrulis

[otto]

Hello all,

I finished a very log post about cores, coils.....wanted to post it but I realized that it has no sence.

Why?

The people have a lot of their ideas, are maybe working on TPUs....I dint want to disturb them with my misleading posts. Its better Im quiet.

All I saw here is that nobody is listening!!

@Paul

try it.

Otto

[wattsup]

@otto

There is no one saying your are wrong or right. If you have some idea please say it regardless.

Ideas are thrown around all the time and it is in these ideas that can give more ideas.

You are right about LTPU output voltage 800V x 1.2 amps = ???
So three coils, one in coil/cap resonance and two driven via the two center toroids via one frequency, makes two frequency and one resonance. If each of the three have only 0.40 amps, how many volts does each have to be to arrive at the above end result on the collector and do they have to be in parallel or series???????? Hey that's toooo easy.

You see, those amp ratings are very revealing. We now know all the wires, toroids, caps, etc., have to resist a minimum volts/amps rating. lol

Also think about the LTPU has two wires going to only one volume control or pot beside the two left on/off switches. I am thinking that if one of the two CC1/crossover lines was driven under resonance, the coil with cap would just follow it, but the third CC2/crossover would have to be trimmed to the first, so only one pot is required. lol

For me it will be easier to build one then to explain one. Build and test is the only way. lol There is a total of approximately 426 control coil turns of wire all around the LTPU. It could be 142 x 3. Or it is most likely 213x2 plus an additional 2 x 112 one to left and one to right of the output with the two black caps. Two half winds agrees better because when SM put his hands over the LTPU to show energy flow it was in a two way method with both hands starting away from him and coming together. Very symmetrically.

Anyways, maybe it is me that is the bother so I will just build one and show it when it is finished. Lucky I won't have to hide anything so this will take much less time.

I think maybe the problem many have with iron is to see where in the tpu there is some iron. But If what you are doing is getting results, then you are doing something right with your iron core technique.

There are many ways to do this and we don't have to make a true tpu replica. I am more oriented to deciphering physically the actual tpu's, slowly but surely, one step at a time, but anyways, the end result is what will really count.

[Grumpy]

All I saw here is that nobody is listening!!

This is correct.