Stanley Meyer and The Water Car Hoax

[Farlander]

As the original antagonist, I offer this new sentiment.  Jason, you're alright, I envy you for being a student of Meyers, but please remember that the forces in control are bending us all towards a conventional, in the box mentality, ESPECIALLY when it comes to nuclear power, which many see as the end-all be-all of power generation.

I differ in my opinion about how the process works.  The water molecule is separated by an extremely high voltage field, or electrical difference potential in scientific terms, which does not actually consume any current.  The water stays cool.  Just like two opposite magnets attract, two electrodes will attract an oppositely charged atom.  That's why hydrogen only forms on the negative electrode.  Hydrogen is H+ when donating it's electron to the O atom.  The pulsing serves two purposes -- two restrict current, and resonate.

[professor]

Hi Newbie 123
Meyers is dead You can not afford to buy his Dune Buggy there is noone on this forum that is presenting this Technology on a silver Platter (I am still hoping for that to happen... Lol) But there is an alternative Buy a Ticket and fly to the Philippines and visit Daniel Dingle.
a  BMW Team  and others did so ,or fly to Shri Lanka ,all of these Inventors are still alive and keeping a low Profile for obvious reasons..
I know that there are more both in New Zealand and Australia  which feel intimidated and stay away from the mainstream media.
Anyway I believe  meyers and the others if you don't its your Loss.
professor

Think about this for a minute....
Is it possible to run a vehicle efficiently on water?   Yes, no doubt.   Einstein knew it and any real physist knows it is possible (and will be utilized someday).
Did Stan Meyer run a car on water?   Maybe.       But until you have seen a real working replication (in person), which none of you have (most likely) ...  The answer might as well be No.
Anyone can claim anything they want, but in the world of proof and science, a technology needs to be replicated multiple times to be accepted (believed).....   Everything else pure speculation.


Stan Meyer's buggy and equipment are all for sale right now, even.

http://waterfuelcell.org/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=136&sid=fabaa50fa39977fdc9df18092519a0ec

Someone is trying to make as much as they can off this stuff ... 80k - 2mil?

How much could they get if they demonstrated the technology working..   50 million + ?      Why don't they show it working in a video?    Think about it.

[professor]

Spinner you really live up to your Name.(German translation)
professor

@Jason_85

You're OK. Education is something you should be proud of. And ( that goes for most of the skeptics here) - keep an open mind!

Why all those hostile posts - I don't know. It looks like some people here hate science and it's achievements.... They can't stand any critique, or questions about their beliefs... A common "religious" stuff... Delusional Fanatics...

I advise them, as a sign of protest, don't use anything which came out of a scientific progress.... Instead, just use FE devices, there are plenty... With all this FE all around you'll be just fine!
This is a typical post.  An ultimate BS.

I assume The Professor is driving a car using the Meyer's "technique". That would explain all the hate & the fanaticism....

I drive a car which runs on Hydrogen and 0xygen (there may be some Carbon present, I think..).

My car uses the same principle like all other vehicles on our planet (several hundred millions). Meyer's type car is a special one. In fact, it's unique. It's just a legend.... It would be great if you could prove it?

If you can do better, please, just do it. For the sake of Humanity.

[Jason_85]

Thanks for the helpful responses, thats exactly the sort of thing I was hoping for when I came here! I know it's hard to create a productive discussion with someone who disagrees with what you believe in, so kudos to all of you who were nice and gave me your view on the technology. I would like to stay but people like professor don't really make it easy, which is a shame really. If there is anything you want to discuss with me, about what I've said or why, there's a forum at the site where I keep my blog, and I'll check back there regularly:

Forum on Stanley Meyer's Super Electrolysis

All the best guys and thanks for an interesting chat!

[sparks]

    @jason

    Your mention of negative entrophy is interesting.   To assume that nature is incapable of ordering anything is where a problem arises.  It is assumed that the bricks falling off the back of a pickup truck will be in a less state of order than before they fell.  Go back a little further and look at the mechanism used to stack the bricks.  Most order necessary to fill the least amount of space.  Gravity comes to mind as well as crystallization.  As well as all chemical reactions.   Fusion-blackhole gravitational fields-novas.   Radiation is not a direct consequence of having more energy in less space.   
      The infrared wave field I referred to is radiant energy.  The electromagnetic waves produced according to Planck's blackbody radiation theory.   I believe that these waves can be mixed with lower frequency emwaves and imposed on mass fields that converts the emwave energy into kinetic energy.  The intrinsic electrostatic molecular charges now becoming oscillations.  Enough to break hydrogen bonds?  Maybe enough to pin down hydrogen ions long enough for the oh ions to move along.