off OU topic distractions

[fuzzytomcat]

Stefan,

I am a bit alarmed that you intend on deleting after one week the 3 or 4 threads dealing with Rosemary Ainslie's circuit. 

I agree that there are many posts that could/should be deleted, but the fact remains that the threads were virtually un-moderated, and for that they deteriorated to the level they are at today.

It would be a shame to lose all those posts that are genuine and on-topic. May I suggest that the worst that be done is to delete all non-pertinent, non-technical posts and leave the threads locked, or just leave them locked as they are.

I don't think it is right to delete them in their entirety, unless of course the thread has no technical merit whatsoever.

.99

Hi poynt99,

I e-mailed my concerns also to Stefan about this matter ....

###############################################################################################

Hi Stefan,

I saw poynt99 posting in http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5605.msg263751#msg263751  and I tend to now agree with him on the original thread " Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie" started by TK, is mostly technical in nature and was locked by me before any flaming could start in it like what happened at Energetic forum. They ended up going through and deleting about 200 postings prior to the letter sent out I posted http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9442.msg263187#msg263187 with there decision, for some reason the links don't work now but the e-mail is there.


DON'T FORGET  ..... the .... "Bash Rosemary Ainslie" self moderated locked thread http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9645.0 if you did deleted the three threads only and not this one ..... who knows what Rosemary would do or say.


The only two postings in the "**UN CENSORED** Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit" and the "Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder" are these .....

EXPERIMENTAL DEVICE TESTING AND EVALUATION "TIME LINE" -
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9442.msg262932#msg262932

"FORUM" Access Problems / File Locations -
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9442.msg262994#msg262994


I did hear from Tektronix and I don't know where Rosemary's "SWORN" affidavit is going but it appears there not happy at all, so no telling what Tektronix and Scribd may do concerning this matter.


Best Regards,
Glen

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Even if Rosemary Ainsile's circuit is not COP>17 or even COP>1 it deserves to be discussed here.

There are plenty of people here at overunity.com that go on and on about having a working overunity device - yet, with perhaps the exception of Omnibus, they get little flak and/or resistance.  Rosemary on the other hand had her thread flooded several times by the same people repeating the same arguments in an attempt to dissuade others from looking into the circuit.  I have to question their motives as most people who disagree with an inventor usually make their comments, defend them to a certain degree, then leave the thread quietly depending on the outcome.  This was definitely not the case in this instance as I believe their goal was to squelch Rosemary Ainslie's thread and halt further public exposure.

If hartiberlin wants this forum to remain successful he needs to implement and apply proper moderation.  It does not need to be heavy handed but even a little moderation would have salvaged that thread.  Squelching discussion is never the answer, maintaining civility should be apart of the forum rules and should be properly enforced by moderators here at all times.

Hopefully this action is not a look at things to come for I fear it will mean the end of this forum as many will find other places to freely interact with their peers without fear of having their work removed and deleted.  I hope you reconsider your actions, Stefan.

Hi Tenbatsu - I assure you that the work is definitely COP>even that 17.  This is precisely why it is being buried.  Please don't allow it to happen.  I need everyone to rally - even if it's simply to download copies of that thread.  Otherwise the work will be resurrected as belonging to you know who.

This is just the start.  They're knocking my work off Scribd and I just PRAY that they don't delete the work at EF.COM. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary could have had a fresh start here on her thread. In her very first post she stated what she intended on doing. Did she follow through? Then in reply #3 she started her bad mouthing again about the previous people who tried to help her. And her bad mouthing continued forward from that post. Go read for yourselves. And in the beginning page she had 2 people offer to start a build. What happened to them? Why didn't they do a build? They both still post in this forum. Go read who they are and ask them why they did not follow through. And its too bad that she didn't learn from her warnings from the Admin on EF.com because she was warned to not talk about or mention the names of certain people and to just go about her own business. Did she comply? She would not have been banned if she followed the advice.

When it comes to bad mouthing Truthbeknown - I don't believe that anyone on any forum anywhere on the internet has been bad mouthed to the extent that I have been.  Curiously it is always and only those members who actively research ou tecnologies and never themselves initiate new ideas - unlike the most of the members here.  There are precisely 6 of them.  And they have followed me EVERYWHERE - either in full on replications or in denying those replications when completed.  What's lacking is their acknowledgement of their own publicly stated results.  And it's that acknowledgement that is scarey.

@Glen.  Your desire to resurrect 'claimed overunity' is another political ploy.  It is the only thread that actively bad mouthed me - at a time when I could not even access this forum - or even that thread.  Your objects are transparent.  Always.

Rosemary

[DeepCut]

I vote for the two lists suggestion.

On the other hand, without having to re-write some PHP, maybe we shouldn't be so click-lazy, it's not hard to find new posts that are only OU-related, it's just not 'at a glance' easy ...

[Mk1]

@all

I have a question about Rosemary heater , first its a heater . How efficient is it compared to other heaters device generally used , regardless of OU claims , that might be the issue ...


Mark