Faraday's Paradox experiment

[sm0ky2]

theres probably quite a few possible solutions to your problem, but this one here i think would be among one of the easiest to construct on your own.

There are 2 key things that must be accomplished to achieve the desired result.
1) the "external circuit" within the EMF of the disk, must not be in motion, relative to the disk.
and
2) the physical point of contact, between the spinning conductor and the stationary outputs, must be arranged such that there is minimal relative motion between the two.

Here is one example of how these two conditions could be met. The only other prerequisit is that the rotational components of the circuit extend far beyond the magnetic field.
I drew these with the wires exposed, but they are better served rigidly attached to or through the axle.

[gravityblock]

It is wrong to say the magnetic field rotates with the magnet or is stationary.  We should say, a moving charge induces a magnetic field, and this induced magnetic field will follow or move with the charge.  There is no such thing as a static magnetic field.  A magnetic field can be moving without it changing in direction or in strength.  There is no paradox when one uses charge motion to analyze the HPM.

GB

[XS-NRG]

The magnetic field is stationary.
It is a property of space itself just like light is and just like radiowaves are.

This is like when you rotate your finger in a bowl of water to create movement in the water.
The water is no part of your finger and the swirling motion is a secondary effect resulting from the primary movement of your finger.

Magnets need to be moved to induce currents.
It is the motion that is converted into electricity.
No movement=no electricity.
It is wrong to think the energy comes from the magnet.

You can stare all day long at that bowl of water but it will not do anything by itself unless you start swirling it with your finger.

A lightbulb is similar you need to put in energy to make it shine.
Bulbs do not shine by themselves neither do magnets put out energy.

[sigma16]

If you could somehow get the spinning electromagnetic entities to self-organize, extracting energy should be relatively easy (since in that state, they would affect charged particles.)

<speculation
This might cause the ZPF to "ring", and then we might extract power out of the damped wave that results-- (kind of like dropping a pebble in a pond, and extracting energy out of the ripples that result).
></speculation>

Since Tesla's most important unpublished papers (his "Dynamic Theory of Gravity", "Theory of Radiant Electricity", and others) were stolen and are being kept in a safe in Los Alamos, New Mexico along with other top secret documents, we only have experimentation to fall back on.  We need to duplicate what Tesla was doing (which should be easy with modern equipment), make astute observations-- and then try to formulate a theory of how (and why) this all works the way it does.  In there somewhere is "The Answer"-- the "Holy Grail".

Step 1: Build a magnetically quenched spark gap

Step 2: Build a sufficiently large high-voltage capacitor

Step 3: Build a high-voltage DC power supply

Step 4: Begin experimenting-- but first try to duplicate Tesla's results, and BE CAREFUL!

=====================================

A magnetic field should point the entities in the same direction.

How would someone know where Tesla's papers are located and what the titles are?  Does this come from the interview with his nephew?  He would probably know these things.

I have steps 1 thru 4 standing by.  If you can set this up as well, we can compare results.

[lumen]

It is wrong to say the magnetic field rotates with the magnet or is stationary.  We should say, a moving charge induces a magnetic field, and this induced magnetic field will follow or move with the charge.  There is no such thing as a static magnetic field.  A magnetic field can be moving without it changing in direction or in strength.  There is no paradox when one uses charge motion to analyze the HPM.

GB

I believe you have this correct!
The field is not forced to be stationary OR is it forced to rotate with the spinning magnet.

If it does no work by staying stationary, then it is stationary.
If it does no work by rotating, then it rotates.

It's only by trapping the field that forces the field to generate a current, and this takes work.

Otherwise the field sticks with the moving charge, or the charge sticks with the moving field, providing no current flows.

I agree, the HPG is no exception.