Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

[wings]

do you have any links to these claims about naudin's MEG and CF replications? and where did you read this about bearden?

all the experiments here:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/

MEG here:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/meg.htm

CF :

http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cfr/index.htm

... interesting CF and negative resistance oscillator test

http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cfr/ape/apenrg.htm

[WilbyInebriated]

Search this forum, under the Relevant topics and spot it yourself.
Carbon fusion, has a topic on its own so its easy to locate it.

no, it's your 'claim', you back it up with some substance...

i have read almost all of naudin's published replications and have never seen what you speak of (a claim of achieving OU).
i have read alot of bearden and never come across what you claim.

what i am saying is, is that you are posting nothing but hearsay... and now you refuse to back your claims with substance, which looks highly suspicious.

[sirmikey1]

Pese,
  I hear that the resistor can be replaced with capacitive step-down (caps in series); an inductive choke; or by using only the SEC power on the transistor base. 
Z

[pese]

Pese,
  I hear that the resistor can be replaced with capacitive step-down (caps in series); an inductive choke; or by using only the SEC power on the transistor base. 
Z

possibly,
but such circuits ca  work "unstabile"
byy temeperature changeing
and need other values it you reconstrucht
this circuit.
the tarnsistors ( even from same type number) can
SREAD wuth gaine up to 100 times.
other paramaters like leackage currents in semiconductor , from
normal value uo to limit in dateasheet  spead moe than 1000.

So it is neccessary to give atention that the BASIS (bias) of driveb transistors is  fixed to an stable point,  that you ca chose with "trimm it out"  as shown in my hand- written design.
I working my whole live in this technique , so you can test this out an belive it

G.P.
i

[baroutologos]

poor noob WilbyInebriated,

I have read also naudin and all his site is OU claims in an implicit way. Go see the MEG section in naudin site. he states OU more or less..

Naudin is untrustworthy. Concerning the Bearden case, yes i read it from a member's comment in this site and i believe it. i do not recall who and where. But I personally do not require much PROOF since Bearden beyond reasonable doubt belongs to the Bullshitters of the OU research..

Finally, i do not think i am the who should provide evidence for apparent claims (of devices that do not work). you and your like should provide evidence about BS-ters and their device (eg Bedini) that claim that work.

Bye bye now..