Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

Started by sirmikey1, October 07, 2008, 10:32:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.


baroutologos

@ Del Boy,

What you are saying in the last posts of yours is the condensed info of Tesla's Colorado springs notes and generally his pursue for signaling and eventually energy transmition.

The point is, nowhere Tesla mentioned that the transmited energy is less than the received. Nowhere.
On the contrary, losses he argues always occurs but to a smaller degree than using EM waves.

The activity of million horsepower, is just power! Not energy. Power in physics is very distinct from energy :) An oscillating system, can develop very large power, yet it has energy?

In my examination of the Colorado springs notes, the only nebulous and potentialy a lead (for me) discovery of Tesla was that his extra coil, when connected to ground (whereas his primary oscillator was nearby and working being grounded also), he managed to attain resonance and lighted some lamps.

He made the ascertation that he could "tap" a portion of that resonance (about 1% and much more...) without spoiling the effect. particularly, his coil had a Q of 15,000 plus, but under load he had an estimated Q of 15.

Apart from that, and concerning the energy transfer technology via the earth, i expressed the concept if there is any natural frequency of the earth, that all the time tramsits considerable power and we need some kind of tuning.
This idea was rejected by Tito.

By the way, not wanting to be categorical, and judjing by your attitude, Delboy, that you speak with certain confidence have you managed to make anything extraordinary??



delboy

Here is smaller one, you can use longitudinal receiver which is less complicated and don't use so much copper :D
By power that receivers can deliver I would sort them like this.
1.   First place patent for one wire or wireless receivers 645576 and 649621
2.   Second place is longitudinal receivers patent 685955 and 787412
3.   Third place are receivers described in patent 685956

Let suppose that we have same transmitter like above described and we want now to use second receiver. Look at picture. Let X be only 2 meters, that means we have 1000 V waiting to be picked up :D Capacitor on receiver now can be much bigger because it does not affect resonanse and let's say it's C=100uF/1kV. If controller on receiver discharges this voltage on receiver R for about every 10ms (100Hz) than we will have power delivered P=10kW :D

Here is not problem in receiver at all. It's problem in design of good transmitter like Tesla described. There is no point in mini Tesla Coil. What is purpose of that „mini“ when it has several thousand of turns and all energy is eaten up by parasitic capacity and that what is left is radiated around in space because of very high frequency!
Mini TC can not develop high reactive power which is required to have enough voltage per length!

delboy

Quote from: baroutologos on March 01, 2010, 01:48:27 PM
@ Del Boy,

What you are saying in the last posts of yours is the condensed info of Tesla's Colorado springs notes and generally his pursue for signaling and eventually energy transmition.

The point is, nowhere Tesla mentioned that the transmited energy is less than the received. Nowhere.
On the contrary, losses he argues always occurs but to a smaller degree than using EM waves.

The activity of million horsepower, is just power! Not energy. Power in physics is very distinct from energy :) An oscillating system, can develop very large power, yet it has energy?
You will agree with me that reactive power is bigger than active?
Than why should not be that reactive energy is bigger than active? Time is running. Energy is power * time !
Tesla find out that he can use this reactive power (energy). I want to say that it is already been used by all motors in all around world. Reactive energy is what runs motor! Active is only heating and friction losses!

forest

Let ask Tito.I think the barebone device is crude one capacitor discharging into bifilar coil.The secondaries pickup magnetic field impulse and converting into current spikes.Part of them are feed back to charge capacitor but throught high self induction coil. The power source is 12V dead battery.Rotarry interrupter made from old car 12V DC electric fan.
KISS  ;D

Tesla igniter patent