Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)

[grizli]

Here is not problem in receiver at all. It's problem in design of good transmitter like Tesla described. There is no point in mini Tesla Coil. What is purpose of that „mini“ when it has several thousand of turns and all energy is eaten up by parasitic capacity and that what is left is radiated around in space because of very high frequency!
Mini TC can not develop high reactive power which is required to have enough voltage per length!

I would not agree

why not maing reciever and transmiter ONE single device ?
we do not need wireless..

voltage can be lower to prevent arcing and pover loss
capacity can be reduced MUCH using pancake coil with wire layers not in the plate surface. or clasic smaller TC with bugger pacing between turns ?

why not 200V primary 4 turn for example and secondary is 50 turns .. max voltage will be hmm maybe 2kV to low for arcing and loss..

question is : is etheric field or torsion field or what every on EARTH planet responsible for free energy obtainable at higher frequencies or like tesla say must be low ?

[grizli]

Than if Q of secondary is for example Q=500, than under resonance this will give 500*2kV =1MV voltage of high frequency. Than you can calculate by uper formula, how big power will be., because it depends on capacity, frequency and square of voltage! Tesla build TC with relativly big diameter. You now why? Because he wanted to reduce loosses in secondary because if you have thousand of turns your voltage will be eaten up by parasitic capacity!

Ask your selves, how come that bulbs are light on connection C when they are short circuit?
I recommend reading this :

Simple 30cm diameter coil about 200 turns of wire has more than 500 Q

for example 30 cm diameter 90 cm long 200 turns 2 mm wire diameter ..

188m wire 12 ohm quater  wave resonance  400 khz , natural LC resonance 700khz

so TELL me how would you calculate Q factor ?
Q=1/R*squareroot(L/C)
L=3431uH
C=15pF(for example) dont know

Q= over 1200

thats NOT low AT all .. and I really dont see if your theory works than also this kind of TC also works ..

[grizli]

DELBOY


If you theory is correct WE REALLY DO NOT NEED TWO TESLA COILS to obtain OU or reactive power

IMAGINE THIS

WE have 5 turns coil LC primary and 5 turns coil secondary . one end of secondary is grounded, wire goes from 5 turns secondary to QUATER wave=  wire length magnifier coil .
At the bottom of magnifier is 5 turns LC reciever low turn coil..
thats IT

reciever 5 turns coil is NOT in magnetic field of primary 5 turns coil. many turn magnifier is FREE away from primary , and 5 turns reciever does not affect resonance = loose coupled..

DO WE AT ALL NEED QUATER WAVE for wire length here ?? cause we DONT need antenna we dont need wireless transmission here !!!

just ALL LC resonances must match !!!

[baroutologos]

Grizly Said:
I would not agree

why not maing reciever and transmiter ONE single device ?
we do not need wireless..

voltage can be lower to prevent arcing and pover loss
capacity can be reduced MUCH using pancake  with wire layers not in the plate surface. or clasic smaller TC with bugger pacing between turns ?

why not 200V primary 4 turn for example and secondary is 50 turns .. max voltage will be hmm maybe 2kV to  for arcing and loss..

question is : is etheric field or torsion field or what every on EARTH planet responsible for free energy obtainable at higher frequencies or like tesla say must be low ?

A little experimentation and you will see your major error you make. I least i saw mine trying to replicate Don Smith's setups..

it all boils down to - in order to get considerable resonance you need small capacity that is located at free terminal (not intercoil capacitance) and large inductunce. No 20 turns ect -

Try your view in an experimental setup and YOU WILL COME to my words.

Cya

[grizli]

A little experimentation and you will see your major error you make. I least i saw mine trying to replicate Don Smith's setups..

it all boils down to - in order to get considerable resonance you need small capacity that is located at free terminal (not intercoil capacitance) and large inductunce. No 20 turns ect -

Try your view in an experimental setup and YOU WILL COME to my words.

Cya

Q is proportional to square root of (L/C) RIGHT.... but all in all why would we want 1000Q if we can make good OU device with 10 ?

what were your experimentational results ?