The law of conservation of energy is wrong!

[nightlife]

Creativity, I see you have figured out what I have been saying and yes I believe the different levels could have and probably should have different names just as long as it is understood that they are all the same.

As for the string theory, you are correct but I can not agree with the string theory because that would link everything together and it is obvious that all things are not linked together, They also say that the vibration is never ending and I can not agree with that either.

I am not good with words or their meanings and I try to use the words I know to explain my thoughts. I find myself using the dictionary quite a bit when reading others comments. LOL

I never really went to school but I think I did learn enough of the basics to get by. My life experiences gave me the education I have. That may be good or bad but it does give me the advantage by coming from outside of the box and not being preprogrammed. I find things wrong that others overlook because of their preprogramming and this thread is one example. I have studied Prof. Walter Lewin's "MIT" video lecture on electricity and magnetism from the spring of 2002 and I found many things wrong with things he is teaching and or has taught. I have tried to contact him but he has yet to return any of my emails.
Of you have time and want to watch them you can download them from the following link. There are 36 different lectures.

http://web.mit.edu/smcs/8.02/

I would like to read about the different vibrancy terms you can explain when ever you feel up to it.

[nightlife]

Paul-R, "there are many forms of energy: sound, electrical, kinetic,
potential and so on.

...and of course, zero-point energy which gets omitted by
those who are not up to speed."

The true energy that creates those you listed is a vibration. They are not energy's, they are some of the things that energy creates.

Keep it simple.
 

[tinu]

@nightlife,

Vibrations or not…
Kept simple or not…
…at least keep it decent by adding “IMHO” or “I think” in front of the name of this thread!
Then, you can start talking…
Oh: maybe the whole thread would look much better in “half baked ideas”. Sorry, but the way it is now, I can’t grasp the news within.

Cheers,
Tinu

[nightlife]

tinu, I am sorry that you "can't grasp the news within" but facts are facts. It is not in my humble opinion, it is a fact and the thread is named appropriately.

[nightlife]

sulake, "Just now, the universe is expanding, so it has not yet reached it’s halve age. When the universe stops expending, it has reached it’s halve age, then it starts to contract again so that everything begins again with a big bang."

I was thinking about what you said and that may be true and it would also confirm my findings. If our universe expands and contracts, it is doing so like a pulse and or vibration does. That would mean that all create vibrations in our universe are just vibrations within a vibration and that would help explain all the types of vibrations that we have. It may be how get different fragrances, taste, colors, fields and substances. We already know that sound comes from one or the combination of many.

The more and more it is thought about, the more and more convincing it is.

Our universe could just be a atom in another universe. Hmmm, LOL

I have stopped experimenting for a few months now because I felt it was more important to find out what energy really was before I could seek ways to create it. Now that I know what it is, I can see why it is hard to create more then what is used to create it.

For all those who seek to create more then what is used, keep this thread in mind.