Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Can someone explain this?

Started by captainpecan, October 24, 2008, 05:18:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

captainpecan

I was messing around with a circuit I'm working on, trying to figure all the losses as I'm designing it, and I came across something I do not understand. I simplified it down to find exactly where my losses are not adding up. Can someone explain to me why this scenario is happening:

I am using 2 identical capacitors purchased from radio shack. 4700uf 35v each and one 1N5397 diode. I am totally discharging 1 capacitor to 0 volts, and charging the other up with a 9 volt battery. I am very simply hooking them in series, and studying the losses as the two capacitors balance themselves out.  I am noticing something funny when I add the diode into the circuit.

First set of tests. Simply hooking the two capacitors together and balancing out the charge between the two.

No diode:
            C1          C2            Total       Loss
Test 1
Start    9.42v  +  0.00v   =   9.42v
Finish  4.66v  +  4.58v   =   9.24v      -.18v

Test 2
Start    9.43v  +  0.00v   =   9.43v
Finish  4.70v  +  4.58v   =   9.28v      -.15v

Test 3
Start    9.37v  +  0.00v   =   9.37v
Finish  4.66v  +  4.55v   =   9.21v      -.16v

                                 Average Loss  -.1633v

Now I did the exact same test, with the diode hooked in series.
With Diode:
           C1          C2           Total        Loss
Test 1
Start   9.39v  +  0.00v   =   9.39v
Finish 4.89v  +  4.37v   =   9.26v      -.13v
Test 2
Start   9.42v  +  0.00v   =   9.42v
Finish 4.90v  +  4.40v   =   9.30v      -.12v
Test 3
Start   9.40v  +  0.00v   =   9.40v
Finish 4.88v  +  4.39v   =   9.27v      -.13v

                                Average Loss   -.1267v

Now, why do I actually show LESS losses when I ADD another component into the circuit? That appears to be backwards. I do not understand why this is happening. So just to check, I eliminated the diode again for one more test...
No Diode:
Test 1 C1          C2            Total       Loss
Start   9.42v  +  0.00v   =   9.42v
Finish 4.65v  +  4.61v   =   9.26v      -.16v

Once again, I show more loss, with less components? Can anyone explain why this is happening? It makes no sense to me.

captainpecan

I again repeated the test, this time with a 1N4001 diode. There did not appear to be any change in losses with or without the diode in the circuit!

Now I'm really confused? I do not have another 1N5397 diode to see if I can repeat the earlier results with a new diode of the same type.

Still, the question stands. Why do I not see an increase in loss when adding a diode to the circuit? Even with the new 1N4001 I did not show an increase in losses?

nievesoliveras

Hi!

I dont know much electronics, but a diode and a capacitor is used to double the voltage.

Jesus

nievesoliveras

Hi!

Maybe this one is a little better to illustrate that diodes and capacitors are used to boost voltage.

Jesus

captainpecan

I'm not sure that explains what I'm seeing, but that's really good info to know. Thanks for posting that, I was not aware of it.