This guy has it FOR SURE so simple..hello!? any1?

[shablol]

theres is noting below those plates he doesnt hide anything....
if you understand the concept you will see it is very straight forword.
the actuator part is like a circute of a pulse motor or maybe even bedini.

[wizardofmars]

This isn't a patent - it's a patent application which was denied in July 2008 because it's a perpetual motion machine. No wonder they could never get it to work.

from page 5 of the International Preliminary Report on Patentability Chapter I (at http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?IA=PL2006000002&wo=2007081229&DISPLAY=DOCS)

The invention of the present application appears to be insufficient in that in cannot be
carried out by a person skilled in the art. A successful implementation of the invention
seems to be Impossible since lt Is In conflict to well established basic physlcal nules:
The following passages in the description
a) motor exploiting the push and pull forces of permanent magnets and earths gravity
(p.1. 1.1.2),
b) “The synchroniser needs to be supplied with electric current, the power of which is
negligible compared to the oulput power on the synchronous motors shaft’ (p.1. 1.25 - p.2,
1.1),
C) “... the motor, once started, can operate without any time restrictions” (p.2, 1.41-42),
d) “... the motor ..... works by exploiting the ..... energy of permanent magnets. ..... and
earth's gravity,
e) “The prototype generates power on the shaft ... of ..... free energy” (p.2, 1.43-44).
refer to an apparatus which allegedly generates more energy than it receives.
This is in conflict with the well established physical law of energy conservation.
Apparently, the expressions “force” and “energy’, being clearly defined physical terms, are
mixAd: (MerhanicaI) energy is defined by a force being experienced during a certain path,
Force alone will not create any energy. Energy can only be transformed into another
energy form but it can never be generated.
For instance, when exploiting the (magnetic) energy of a permanent magnet the magnet
will be demagnetised. Then however, the motor as described will no more be “operating
without any time restrictions” but rather stop.
It appears impossible to construct an apparatus which is kept moving in a way that the
output energy is greater than any input energy (perpotuum mobile).
Therefore, the applimation seems not to fulfill the requirements of Article 5 PCT, which
consttutes a deficiency which substantially cannot be overcome.

[shablol]

lol....

you are pathetic.
10x for bringing my post back up...
with much love. i will
start the day with a smle.

[wizardofmars]

you are pathetic.

That's pretty funny coming from someone who doesn't know the difference between a patent and a denied patent application.

[magkor]

That's pretty funny coming from someone who doesn't know the difference between a patent and a denied patent application.

In shablol's defense, 1.) he's an L2 English learner and 2.) the patent office dismisses summarily anything claiming over-unity. I'm willing to be there was zero attempt to assess the contraption.

Cheers