The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!

[allcanadian]

@innovation_station

this is my HEMF CASCADE AMP .....  JUST INCASE YOU MISSED THAT INVENTION....   
IST!

What the--------- , I invented that a few months ago LOL. Using exactly the same process, talk about Deja Vu. Im going to have to pull up my pants and put my thinking cap on, I thought I was one step ahead of you ------ but maybe Im one step behind, LOL.

@Yucca

I tried googling "switched energy resonant power supply" and came accross this page describing how to minimise losses when transferring charge between caps:
http://www.smpstech.com/charge.htm
it was a good read for me!

Yes, who would have though that adding an inductance to a capacitance could ensure a lossless transfer of energy between two capacitors. Another example of why what we call science is nothing more than a religion of repetition---they do the same thing over and over and then delare it law.LOL
It's a good thing Im a bit of a trouble-maker----- make no mistake I mean to misbehave .

[tinu]

This forum is in deep deep trouble if the above is true.

ROTFL!
Sad thing: it may already be in deep trouble with so many webers and maxwells around.
(Hint: 1 Weber = 1 Tesla square meter = 10E8 Maxwells  )

[tinu]

@ Yucca

I agree, further testing to show actual energy would be great. I do not have any better means than what I have shown available right now. Next question is this: If the energy is greater, then it's proven further. If the energy happens to actually show less, then what is causing the extra work to be performed? Either way, the extra work being performed is happening every single time, without fail. And is easily duplicated. So one way or another, there is definitely something here!

@captainpecan,

It goes deeper and deeper with movie #5 and everything…

Several flaws:
1. Inserting a diode does not mean ‘one shot from one capacitor to the other’. Whoever told you that is wrong. That diode will open and close many times (so there are actually many shots) in what you call ‘one shot’! It will indeed prevent current to flow in one direction but that’s another story. Think about it.
2. When you turn the switch on, your motor does indeed do some work but that’s not the ‘work that has been done’ (your words). That’s just the work that has been done BY THE MOTOR ONLY, which incidentally has nothing to do with the work done by the capacitor because:
a) your motor is of very low efficiency (I have a motor that should easily run about 1.5min-2min on 4700microF at 9V and still that wouldn’t mean anything relevant here. You may as well put a 380 V motor in between caps and say the work is zero; so what?!)
b) your motor is not linear in voltage and it actually may, at its best, give only an inaccurate indication of  the strength of an initial kick (dI/dt).

What extra work?!! There is none! (but so far it is not even guestimated; as per above something else than work is measured, although improperly)

Cheers,
Tinu

[AhuraMazda]

you all think my  last finished tpu dont work!!!   lol

@IST

Just how many OU devices do you want to make?
In fact, have you ever thought of sharing your TPU technology with the rest of us?

[HEYDUDE]

Fatal flaw:  the motor is not a motor in that it will not run freely if connected to a steady source of current. In this case, the coils will initially repel the magnets and create motion, but then the magnets will also find a null point between the coils, since there is no commutation circuit the rotor will lock at an in between position.

What you have is a short pulse detector: i.e. a short pulse will give an initial kick to the rotor then decay away quickly and there will be no repulsion left as phase two is entered by the magnets. A longer pulse will initially kick the rotor but as  phase two is entered by the rotor, the rotor is repelled again, but in the opposing direction and actually produce faster decay of the rotation.

Because of this the numbers will add up in favor of shorter pulses. A longer higher energy pulse results in an initial acceleration, and braking in phase two.  This is easy to see.

The experiment needs to be run with a real load.