The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!

[Groundloop]

@captainpecan,

I have started to build my "tripulse" motor based on your theories.
My frictionless (almost) rotor is done with two neodymium magnets,
one facing north out and the other facing south out.

I have a question for you. How many turns and size (also magnet wire thickness) is your coils?
(I'm about to make the three coils now.)

Also, I would like some comments on what is the best solution, positive feed back loop or a negative
feed back loop? See the attached drawing.

Regards,
Groundloop.

[captainpecan]

@captainpecan,

I have started to build my "tripulse" motor based on your theories.
My frictionless (almost) rotor is done with two neodymium magnets,
one facing north out and the other facing south out.

I have a question for you. How many turns and size (also magnet wire thickness) is your coils?
(I'm about to make the three coils now.)

Also, I would like some comments on what is the best solution, positive feed back loop or a negative
feed back loop? See the attached drawing.

Regards,
Groundloop.

If I was going to remake my coils all over again, they would be 131.2 ft of 22guage wire.  Is it important to use these exact figures, probably not, as when I started getting good results I just simply used old coils from another project and they were not anything special. 

I chose a tri-coil configuration, for two reasons.  The first reason was because I had 3 coils already, and the second was due to the size of the rotor, 3 seemed to give me plenty of clearance between the coils to allow me to ad 3 more coils easily to generate some energy from the rotation.

Personally, I am using all 3 coils in series.  Each pulse uses all three coils.  I found it to increase the rotation and torque without increasing the input.  I was also able to easily increase the rotation and torque simply by adding more magnets.

[Groundloop]

@captainpecan,

Thank you for the fast answer.

OK, so my coils must then be designed so that I do not exceed the amperage rating of my reed relays.
I will use three read relays as shown because I will try to get the charge go from one capacitor to the next.
That is also the reason I have used only two magnets, one facing north out and one facing south out.
This will ensure that only one reed relay will be closed when the two others is open.

Do you have any thoughts on what is the best way to feed back the back emf generated voltage?
To the positive rail or to the negative rail? Others, any thought on this? Sparks?

Groundloop.

[innovation_station]

ground loop your reeds will crash and burn bro 

they look week   

i used BIG REEDS and they burn up ...   in seconds.....   cap it as i told you long ago you have failed to do so your reeds will burn out and you get no OU  just like you proved many times already ....



cap it cap it cap it lol

i drew you a pic ....

ist!

you know once capped it can not be proven wrong ... 

do you know why it works?

i looked for some earlyer  displayed youtube vids showing this sh!t but they have been removed   inagine that...  ha!   i wouldnt know why   

i may find a new 1 or 2 ...  lol

[captainpecan]

@ Groundloop

Honestly, in theory, it appears that the negative feedback would make more sense.  It may not be a bad idea to test both ways.  This theory could use some info from others here, anybody?