Joule Thief

[Mk1]

@koen1

All i am saying is show something i never heard about, and yes sometimes things go beyond logic, you can tell me i am wrong all you want dude , i personally don't care , all i am saying is unless you build it you will not get much , Like tesla call them initiated ones, people that build to learn in the process , Stop hiding behind your calculator !

Let me ask you all those laws 200 years old , are they always right ? Then tell me , lab data and laws always match.
The problem is no one took the time to make sure they are , the only way to do so is to mirror them if they don't work both way them those laws sounds more like clues , questioning results ? question the model!

Beside telling people are wrong , what can you give us , maybe ideas on modification? and constructive ?
Its harder when you need to get down to it?

I usually read all post , i am sorry i even bothered to read yours , i am still waiting your input but only downput , no lab testing ? or picture , schematic , or idea , so what is your goal.

You seem to say you know this stuff , then show us something new . Not picking one people to raise your self worth , and i am a easy pray , since i don't really care what other think , education is a good thing but can also be a prison .

I can admit when i am wrong , but so far i have no reason to do so .



Mark


Edit : I don't claim OU since it logically can't be , there will never be more energy then inputted in the system, but using only one secondary is a waist of energy , since all coil are subject by the same flux and exhibit the same properties this doesn't break any laws, so yes the current is the same in all coil on a toroid , having a bad toroid will produce more lost , i even posted picture many times showing those high voltage ! what else do you need , and some people did even better , As far as suggestion of OU then i would say people are funny since they only see what they are programed to , and that always affect the way we read things and see , i am not any different and i like to say to my defense i have a different conception of what is needed in this world , battery charging motors are a good beginning but at one point we need to realize that charging battery is energy losing process , because battery are hard to charge and time consuming, But since we would only need 1.5 volts on this technology we could still do charging battery but from chemical reaction , home made battery , cheap made from recycled household product , that is almost free , now why would i even care to claim OU, Since its not the concept anyway , you make those claims your self , but that being said having more output of the same current its a improvement , and yes i made improvement on the jt design , the first i made was to put one secondary on a regular jt , last year , now i can put 20 , and they all give me the same so , what can i say .


Edit again , Yes there is loss of energy in the toroid , get a radio and a jt the radio will pick it up , now tell me if i had 20 radio , only one would work? same with the coil !

           

[jeanna]

OK all you scop-ies (scopie, noun = person who knows how to use a scope)

Where would YOU connect the ground probe if YOU were to test the secondary from a joule thief?

Please, if you don't mind, test a few usual places and see what seems to be right to you.

thank you,

jeanna

[Mk1]

@all

I Just found this , the circuit could be adapted for jt , but also the circled part is interesting there is a coil there humm...


I also did more test on the positive feed back i got 90 dc volts, but it was late , i will make some more today.

[Mk1]

@all

Ok gadget showed us that creating a resonance on the base coil , can lower the amp draw , the following circuit dose the same but on the collector coil using the hho cell like a capacitor, we could use the idea and make thanks to gadget and Guru , a double resonant circuit both coil , humm ...

[jeanna]

Here is something we can do with a joule thief. ...Light 100 leds on 1 battery per sheep.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2FX9rviEhw

We probably won't but it is quite a sight.

jeanna