Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Thief

Started by Pirate88179, November 20, 2008, 03:07:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 142 Guests are viewing this topic.

TheNOP

Quote from: jadaro2600 on April 22, 2009, 04:49:06 AM
I was just wondering if it was the collapsing magnetic field of the coil to collector that is causing the voltage gains in the secondary - wouldn't the coil to base be interfering with the maximum gains attainable by the secondary?
in a way, yes.
but not as much as you might think.

there is a tradeoff here.
either you complicate the circuit to trigger the base with an external oscilator and remove the base coil.
or you keep the circuit like it is now, simple, yet,
hard to master because changing 1 small thing affect a key factor.(the frequency)

for 1.5 volts applications the bjt is the way to go.
for higher voltage source, an external oscilator is perfered, by me at least.

external oscilator is also possible with 1.5 volts, but since we must prevent interferences from reaching the oscilator circuit it limit the lowest voltage it can operate at.

nievesoliveras

Quote from: Artic_Knight on April 21, 2009, 07:28:26 PM
here is the tesla patent that resembles our work here on the joule thief.  its initial dual coil design gets the high frequency (without need of transistor) then runs it through a second transformer for the extra kick in high voltage. and to think there could be a high voltage high frequency regulator with nothing but a copper wire :)

Do you have a modern version of this circuit?

Jesus   

xee2

@ jadaro2600

Quote from: jadaro2600 on April 22, 2009, 04:49:06 AM
I get more voltage when using the 150 winds as the coil to collector than I do when using it as a secondary.

Yes. So what. You seem to be missing the point. Which is:

Quote from: jadaro2600 on April 22, 2009, 04:49:06 AM
I'm consistently having more luck with the coil to collector - which puts me in a position to damade the transistor due to over voltage.

If you have a high voltage on the collector coil it will zap the transistor. You do not say, but I am sure that the voltage on the 150 turn coil when used as a pickup coil is much higher than the voltage on the 12 turn collector coil when used as part of the JT. Measure them and tell me what the voltages are. The point is that using a pickup coil allows you to get high voltage without zapping the transistor. You seem to have some sort of mental block about this.

The pickup coil can also be used to get higher currents if it has fewer turns than the collector coil. More turns than collector coil yields higher voltage than collector coil, fewer turns yields higher current than collector coil.







jeanna

@jadaro,

I have been "downloading" (from the quantum field) a lot of information for the last month. AK's insistence on sending us to view Tesla patents (  ;) ) got me to do something I have been wanting to follow up on but have not. It is the main reason I do not want to COLLECT the output in a capacitor. I want to keep it as AC.

In this patent is Tesla's discovery, more than the light bulb or the spark gaps as switches or anything. This is what has been in our faces and hidden from view all along.

Please look at and read his comments in this
http://www.pat2pdf.org/pat2pdf/foo.pl?number=462418

In this patent he states that his discovery has to do with excessively high voltage and frequency.

It would seem that since in AC, the amps go first one way then the other, never really going anywhere at all, that Tesla discovered that merely having them "exist" for an extremely short time is the same thing as having them "travel" down" the wire.

Hidden in plain view.

We need higher voltage and higher frequency.

Lets DO IT.

jeanna

TheNOP

Quote from: jeanna on April 22, 2009, 12:11:05 PM
Please look at and read his comments in this
http://www.pat2pdf.org/pat2pdf/foo.pl?number=462418

In this patent he states that his discovery has to do with excessively high voltage and frequency.

It would seem that since in AC, the amps go first one way then the other, never really going anywhere at all, that Tesla discovered that merely having them "exist" for an extremely short time is the same thing as having them "travel" down" the wire.

Hidden in plain view.

We need higher voltage and higher frequency.

Lets DO IT.

jeanna
you are already doing it jeanna.

knowing what tools he had, to come to his conclusion, how would you have describe what Tesla discovered ?
making corelation between, the old electric terms, and the today's terms, use to describe things, is not always easy unless you have experiences in the field.

did you know that in his last years of life he found that extremly higher voltage was not needed to see a "new" electricity ?

today, we have better tools and you can see what Tesla needed high voltage to see, ... in the jt.
i tell you, frequency is the key.

no matter what someone else tell you, we have Tesla knowledge teached to us at schools.
they don't teach who first discovered inrush current nor who discovered mag field collapse effect.
but they do teach us about them.
they teached me how to suppress them, or how to use the later in high voltage applications such as flyback transformer.

and you know what ?
what i see when i look at the open SM TPUs are, ... joule thiefs.

the later TPU are probably also relying on other specific effect(s) as well,
but at the base there is those kicks at high frequency in both.
no OU, just a new way to make things work.

for me SM's special inverter is nothing more then a modulated AC signal made with a ~5kHz currents carrier.

i might be wrong, but that is my educated guess.