Joule Thief

[stprue]

I am not sure what to say , but that facts are , there is 2 way of wiring coil like there is 2 side to a magnet.

On one side they attract them self the other repulse . Both show energy release .

Mark

I didn't think about it that way and now it makes sense.

I was thinking about it like one side is wired down so field direction is going down but then it crosses over and starts from the top and goes down again! (as seen on Jeannas colored in pic of the coil) That's why to me it looked like they would cancell eachother out. This way of thinking is wrong!

[jeanna]

Is  it just me .........or  is this setup  the same as a MK2 only with  one wire  rotated  90 degrees ?
gary

Yes gary,
Not the MK2, but the x2

I was not sure that Mark liked my idea so I didn't want to force the name into his 'folder' so I came up with a name close but not the same.

double cross is how I am saying dblxx.
The meaning of it is obvious.

But it is in place of the primary bifilar and I am thinking (hoping) it is the rotating magnetic field dynamo... Only, in a smaller form.

It still works with 1 transistor which is one of my personal limits for this project.

I will look at it more today.
It works really well.
I was thinking of using the gsu hyperphysics site's pictures to  explain the directions of "mag/elec" if I get to it.

wow, good stuff today!
thank you,

jeanna

[jeanna]

All greetings I from Russia, therefore excuse for my English!!!


And still the question condenser marks, for example 100uF is microfarads?

Welcome nikzagvit ,

Yes, microfarads

At me a question as you receive from 380v to 600v? The scheme same what has offered hazens1.

We have many ways to make this high voltage.
Yes, Hazens made a good one.

Class theme at you, has reconsidered all theme, even has collected the Jule Thief.

Please try to say this a different way. I do not understand.
Here are my guesses:

At me = from my understanding?
class theme = thread?

but I am lost with these word combinations:

collected the Jule Thief = ?
reconsidered = ?

thank you,

jeanna

[jeanna]

...but then it crosses over and starts from the top and goes down again!...
...That's why to me it looked like they would cancell eachother out.

I found it interesting that I had to switch from over* to under** after it crossed over.
Then even with a mistake it worked, but when I crossed to the other side and went over, it stopped.

The way I explained that to myself is this:
In one wire, the impulse needs to be going the same way to the end of the wire.
When the one wire has opposite charges doing: >< and possibly doing: <> it stops it all.

If we leave it up to the magnetic field, the switching in the wire can occur and fast.

I even think this is what the pancake is all about. it keeps the direction the same to the end of the wire.
Once it has stopped going in that one direction the electricity stops.
And then, the magnet field collapses and the reversal comes into the wire as electricity again, but now it flows in the other direction.

*over= begin and end the winding by going over the core.
**under= begin and end the winding by going under the core.

thoughts and ideas,

jeanna

[Mk1]

@nikzagvit

Ð"обро пожаловаÑ,ÑŒ на проÑ,екÑ,ор, вы можеÑ,е использоваÑ,ÑŒ эÑ,оÑ, переводчик



http://translate.google.com/translate_t#en|ru|welcome%20to%20the%20tread%20%2C%20you%20can%20use%20this%20translator%20%0A%0AMark

ОÑ,меÑ,иÑ,ÑŒ