Joule Thief

[jeanna]

MK1
Did you verify the claims yourself?

You know it was Faraday who tried and tried to find electricity coming from a steady magnetic field and he found he could not.

Are you saying you have found how to do that?
I do not think sticking a magnet onto a pulsing magnetic field is the same thing, but is that what you mean by standing magnet?
I have found that adding a magnet increases frequency and lowers voltage.
I personally believe higher frequency actually means we need less amps, so it may work.

@ist,
Have you been able to get heat from less than the watt cost of a standard heater?
I watched your spark heaters and It got me thinking a lot about immersion heaters, but in those videos you were using so much power, it was hard to see if what you were doing was more efficient??
Was it?

I found what you were showing very hopeful, but I was not too sure about the power use.

jeanna

[Mk1]

MK1
Did you verify the claims yourself?

You know it was Faraday who tried and tried to find electricity coming from a steady magnetic field and he found he could not.

Are you saying you have found how to do that?
I do not think sticking a magnet onto a pulsing magnetic field is the same thing, but is that what you mean by standing magnet?
I have found that adding a magnet increases frequency and lowers voltage.
I personally believe higher frequency actually means we need less amps, so it may work.

First the claims have been verified publicly in a electronic magazine . 1970s french i read . included in the last post.

Also faraday its old stuff ... he did find the kick.

But check this out .

http://www.nequaquamvacuum.com/en/english-section/alt-sci/12-magnetic-current-radio-craft-1944.html


Also in the last post the standing field is not generating , it create the environment needed to direct the full energy out of the oscillation to the pickup coil ...

But hans coler  did provide the engilsh gouvernement with proof that energy can directly generated by magnets.

http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/HansColer/Photos/coler2.jpg

[jeanna]

Mark,
I only asked you if YOU have been able to do it.

I do not mind seeing patents but if a person I know has actually done something it is much more valuable to me than a drawing.

I cannot understand that cohler drawing.

A changing magnetic field is all around us all the time.
We use a changing magnetic field in our circuits.
Your MK1 - MK16 secondaries make the magnetic field change MORE times per input pulse than a plain solenoid.

Faraday may be old stuff but its application in the circuit we are working with is not old.

We are working on an old law in a new way. Tesla is old too. but his discoveries have mostly not been tried either. Only when they are used at a low frequency with high amps.

Have you been successful with the cohler patent?

jeanna

[Mk1]

@jeanna

I did not go the coler way yet , but i am not willing to stop at faraday ...

As you must realize my search is jt more in the mayer ball park ...

And for the solenoid comment , not really relevant since the coil is pulsed by external means .

I and just keeping a open mind ... that thing shut off very quickly if no precaution are taken .

Mark

[resonanceman]

To anyone thinking of using a flyback transformer:

I know this has already been said, but it is worth saying again. These things are extremely dangerous. Yucca was putting in 10 watts of power (20v @ 500ma) and in my experience the JT is about 10-20% efficient. Thus, even at 10% efficiency he had over 1 watt of power coming out at more than 10,000 volts. This is VERY DANGEROUS.

Xee
20 V ?

That  got me thinking a little. 



Almost  all of my  stuff  has been with a single  AA  so far
I have  played  with  higher  voltages  a little .
I have a couple of pictures  showing how I   set it up .
I labeled some stuff hopefully  it the pictures will explain themselves.

gary