Joule Thief

[resonanceman]

The idea is to construct a system that is very robust, and one that will handle real work load with no maintenance.
it is necessary to stay away from transistors, resistors etc.

Cotton dielectric produces desirable phonemomena in lighting. When the electromagnetic conductor and dielectric inductors are polar in function and combined in parallel, upon electrical stimulation there is created an oscillating circuit. The dielectric is the other half of electricity, it is the manifestation of electricity over the surface of the conductor, the skin effect.

hidave

I edited  your post a little ...I left  the parts that I agree with completely.

I have some theorys about a no transistor JT.
At the moment I just have theories.
Once I get a chance to test at least the basic theorys I will post something about it.

One little hint... it will  be based on a Perpetual Motion Holder.

gary

[NickZ]

     @Resonanceman and Conradelectro:
   I feel that most of what you are mentioning is true, BUT- if the Jtc provides no extra energy, and only add loses to a circuit, such as with component heat,  dimmer Leds intensity etz.  How would you explain the fact that an strong Jtc can light several hundred Leds with 1 volt for as long as it does? 
  100(s) leds bulbs times 3v, 20 mA=?   
More whan one AA 1.5v, 700 mA contains.
  Science currently has not provided an adequate  explanation (as far as I'm concerned) for the efficiency of the above working device. So, how would you suppose that the example above is possible... and much more,  as we are now finding out?
                      NickZ

[resonanceman]

     @Resonanceman and Conradelectro:
   I feel that most of what you are mentioning is true, BUT- if the Jtc provides no extra energy, and only add loses to a circuit, such as with component heat,  dimmer Leds intensity etz.  How would you explain the fact that an strong Jtc can light several hundred Leds with 1 volt for as long as it does? 
  100(s) leds bulbs times 3v, 20 mA=?   
More whan one AA 1.5v, 700 mA contains.
  Science currently has not provided an adequate  explanation (as far as I'm concerned) for the efficiency of the above working device. So, how would you suppose that the example above is possible... and much more,  as we are now finding out?
                      NickZ

NickZ

Anyone with more than half an education knows that  OU is impossible .
I guess you could say that I have less than half an education



If  you are a good little kid and believe everything  you have ever been taught  then a JT will never reach overunity.

In my opinion  Tesla was one of the all time greatest inventors but few know  of most of his inventions.
Tesla was a great inventer but he was very foolish in some ways.
Tesla did not have any idea of how  greed dominates the buisness world.
Tesla tried to bring free or almost free energy to the people.........and for his trouble he was blacklisted.
Sense the time  of Teslas blacklisting  the culture of those trained in energy related fields  is one of ridiculing any new ideas..........
As a result we know much less about energy now than Tesla did in his time.

The curriculum of all our schools has been tweaked ..... Some things are ignored.........some  are dismissed... for some there are work arounds......like  the back EMF pulses from coils.........they teach how to get rid of them.........as far as I know  they do not teach  how to use these pulses for higher efficiency.
JTs are all about these pulses.
JTs are not conventional technology.

If a JT is ever proven to be over unity it will be by using non traditional technology ......

How a current is induced in a secondary looks to me like one of the areas that is mostly ignored by conventional teaching.
I do not think it will ever be studied well ........at least until OU is proven.
I believe to truly understand how a current is induced in a secondary will show us  how to induce a current in MANY secondarys...... AKA overunity .

The OU vultures here can give you a hundred reasons why OU is impossible.
With technology  nothing is possible .........until it is possible.
All you need is knowledge .
To say that we  know all that there is to know about anything........especially energy is to me the ultimate form of stupidity.
I am  going to keep looking into the quirks of electronics ........eventually someone will find something ........and  the powers that be will fail to stop the information in time.\
That is when the world wins..... that may be when we start pulling out of this world wide recession



gary

[The Observer]

Just to add to the discussion,

It is fair to say that OU (Over-Unity) does not accurately describe that which we seek here.
Over-Unity really means "Unrecognized Energy Source".

           Because only an infinitesimal sliver of time ago man realized that a stick (wood) was a Source of Energy,
           and new Energy Sources have been continually discovered since...
           it is fair to say that we have only scratched the surface of discovering new Sources of Energy.

As Heisenberg once said, "There is enough energy in a glass of water to boil the all the world's oceans."

Best Regards,
                     The Observer

P.S.  My best idea for "OU" is Resonating Multiple Ignition Coils from a Single Joule Thief.

I believe...
                              the Phenomenon of Resonance
                                                 &
                           Ferromagnetic's Free Electron Spin
                                                                                          are Unrecognized Sources of Energy.



                   

[resonanceman]

It is fair to say that OU (Over-Unity) does not accurately describe that which we seek here.
Over-Unity really means "Unrecognized Energy Source".

         
                 

The Observer

I do not agree.

If I can make a  JT based circuit that powers itself and  drives a load of some kind.............. it is OU
I do not have to define where the energy comes from in order to make it  OU .........

gary