Why does mass slow time?

[triffid]

I made a interesting observation some time ago here with spinning lines of magnetic force.About three years ago I got two round salt boxes Like what you buy at the store all the time.I pretended they were big magnets.I sat both of them upright and labeled the top "N" and the bottom "S" with a big magic marker.I marked a spiral  going in the same direction on top and bottom of the salt boxes.All two boxes had a spiral marked top and bottom.Now remember the line of force if it spins mantains the same direction of spin through out the saltbox(which is acting as our model here).So if your spirals are (hopefully) drawn correctly.When you put opposite poles together .You will see that the spirals(which you drew on a saltbox with a big black magic marker) go in the same direction so they merge into one another(they attract).But when I put same poles together the spirals went into opposite directions (they repel).So unlike poles attract and like poles repel.I believe this is due to the possibilty that they spin on their own axis.My models seem to suggest this.Triffid

[triffid]

Now this info is public domain.Better to put it here than anywhere else I guess.At least give me the credit if not the money.Triffid

[PYRODIN123321]

@triffid
Homopolar motors slightly baffle me...for some reason I can't wrap my head around the way those work....cool suff man, at least there is still stuff to figure out about em....

@tournamentdan
Hey, no offence but I think ole gravity has got ya on this one , just try to take everything with a grain of salt, open up a little, don't get hung up on technicalities (distracting) just theories anyways, fun to think about! Don't get caught up in a pissing contest of who's wrong and who's right cause theres a good chance that we as a intelligent race (ha!) don't know our heads from our asses, the more you know, the more you should realize you don't know anything.....

[PYRODIN123321]

@gb

In regards to time travel, I have been thinking why, if time travel was possible, do we not see people from the future etc., so I thought maybe to travel back in time you would need a time machine (duh!) and a time machine to travel too, so once time travel is invented you can go back only to previous points after its invention, neat to think about....

peace

[gravityblock]

@all

In Dr. Mallatt's time machine you could only travel back in time until the machine was first turned on, just like pyrodin has said. 

I think there may be another way for a time machine, by traveling an Inverse Archimedes Spiral near the speed of light to open up a worm hole throat to the zero point dimension that leads to all Time and universes.  This will not be possible until other technologies are perfected, and from my research those technologies are not too far away. You can think cuttingedge for this information, and it seems to be much inline with Dr. Mallatt's work as far as causing space-time to twist or bend into a loop which opens up a wormhole throat.

The difference between Cuttingedge's and Dr. Mallatt's time machine, is Cuttingedge's time machine itself is traveling into the future or the past with it's occupants, which means they could travel into the future or back into the past prior to the machine being turned on.

Dr. Mallett's work is trying to prove the concept with what is possible today with our current technology.  The interesting thing to keep in mind, is the Relativity Theory of Einstein allows for this stuff to be possible.

Maybe some of the UFO's are from a future earth.  Just a thought.