Cavitation. The key to overunity?

[Grumpy]

About your wire gamma ray detector. That's not a good idea, even if it was sensitive enough, because you wouldn't know if it's picking up gamma rays, radio frequency waves, or even electrostatic fields that could be caused by just about anything.

If you can provide mathematics then scientists are willing to listen, including myself.


You did not read my website. You'll see where it goes over the mathematics showing how a diode array chip is predicted to produce kilowatts. 


PL

Ah-Ha!  Paul!  I see you are familiar with this sort of detector - the two wire coil thing.  So far it only seems to pick up stuff that is longitudinal.  (Another one for the troll boys - write it down.)  How do you know what the gamma detector picked up?  It just detects an induced charge.

Here is a million dollar quesion:  Does a Geiger counter respond to lightning?

Hint: storm chasers use them.

(You may not be aware that Hertz initially detected longitudinal waves before he detected transverse waves.  His diaries were released a few years ago.  So, the story about Tesla going to visit him may be true after all.)

I stopped reading about diode arrays when I saw the word "predicted". 

Also, I can not construct my own diode array chip or many of the the fancy devices that abound on the web these days, so I was forced to find my kW's elsewhere.  When Tesla  stated that he could easily pull 100 amps from the third coil of his magnifier - everyone should have listened.

[BEP]

Here is a million dollar quesion:  Does a Geiger counter respond to lightning?

Hint: storm chasers use them.

No Bovine Excrement!

It is a handy tool for locating a well formed tornado when the visibility is zero, as well!

I just used one three days ago. Darned thing only missed my house by 1.5 miles! For lightning the range is based upon the strength of the strike more than distance.  And that is using a used GM tube with parts from my junk box.

[Grumpy]

No Bovine Excrement!

It is a handy tool for locating a well formed tornado when the visibility is zero, as well!

I just used one three days ago. Darned thing only missed my house by 1.5 miles! For lightning the range is based upon the strength of the strike more than distance.  And that is using a used GM tube with parts from my junk box.

So, what do Geiger counters actually detect?

[sparks]

So, what do Geiger counters actually detect?

     high frequency of high intensity

[spinner]

Geiger/Muller tubes/counters are usually a LOW COST devices which are mostly used as an indicator for a possibility of radiation consequences (mostly Beta and Gamma radiation presence).

Something like a "live-wire indicator screwdrivers" are for AC electricity... A measuring/correct quantisation is not the main purpose of those instruments...

Not exactly a "death proved" method for evaluating nuclear radiation effects... (there are instruments capable of detecting the radiation effects by orders of magnitude higher sensitivity...). Of course, they're a bit more expensive...

Yes, if your 15$ Geiger is working correctly and it is detecting something, you may have already been exposed to an "above normal level", or cumulative (usually unhealthy) dosage of radiation. (depends on the time of exposure....)


The Beta radiation consists of the high energy electrons (released not only by nuclear activity but even with, e.g. partial activity in CR Tubes, or (natural) violent atmospheric electricity discharges (lightning)), ....IT IS quite possible to detect natural lightnings with Geiger's.... Although you may see a lightning with your own eyes before you hear the "clicks" from your Geiger...

Check your "Geiger" close to a brush-type electromotor... If it doesn't show at least some decline of a needle ( or if there is no apparent sound clicks) / analog type), then it is not working correctly....




I'm one of those people who have serious objections (or problem with understanding) with TheBuzz's theory of "All FE devices works because of the Cavitation"...

Firstly, I don't know for any such FE devices.

And secondly, I *think* I understand what "Cavitation" really means.

Btw, naming a "Meternitha device" as a proof for Cavitational OU must be a joke.