"Smoking Gun" - finally!

[PaulLowrance]

A person on my website, although anonymous, claims to have replicated my 156 diode array that produced 10uV DC -->
http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/forum/index.php?topic=102.0

More good news. Tonight was the scheduled 156 diode array measurement -->
http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/forum/index.php?topic=2.msg246#msg246

PL

[hakware]

It seems that if you could get the voltage up to above the 1.4v forward drop across the diode array then you could get some useful work out of the thermal noise (AKA Johnson Noise) on the diodes. By the way a guy from Hawaii (CB KUAI (misspelled) on yahoo groups) had a very similar design and as of a few years ago and actually had some chips made

[PaulLowrance]

It seems that if you could get the voltage up to above the 1.4v forward drop across the diode array then you could get some useful work out of the thermal noise (AKA Johnson Noise) on the diodes.

That's true, but it's also true that the diode never stops rectifying, even in the nanovolt region. Below the thermal voltage level, which is 26mV at room temperatures, the diode square law is rather accurate. Diode square law is part of conventional physics. Small signal diode modeling mathematics is found at -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/physics/dirtydetails/

PL

[PaulLowrance]

Last night was the scheduled 156 diode array measurement. As expected, it produced a DC voltage.

Some more good news occurred last night when Tom Schum wrote the following about his 32x32 1N34A diode array measurements -->

Quote from Tom Schum:

I guess the data appears conclusive, but during the taking of the data the numbers jumped around so much I was confused.

What Tom is referring to as jumping around is +/- 0.2uV out of 1uV DC. As I detailed for Tom in email, his microvolt meter could only be responsible for producing roughly 0.02uV DC at most on the diode array, due to bias current. Tom's initial reasoning for calling the results inconclusive was based on the term "accuracy."  As explained to Tom, it does not matter if the results were 1% off or 50% off. The fact remains that his microvolt meter is fully capable of detecting the change in DC voltage when reversing the input polarity. There was no doubt that his voltage meter was measuring a DC voltage, but the exact DC voltage is more difficult to pin point due to the voltage meters output noise. So the next step for Tom would have been to take his diode array out to rural areas to verify that the DC voltage was not due to external RF signals.

As far as my electrometer, there are no such fluctuations. At most, on rare occurrences, it will fluctuation about 2uV DC, but usually does not fluctuation more than 0.5uV DC. Also, my electrometer resolution is 0.5uV DC, and the 156 in-series SMS7630 diode array has produced up to 204uV (0.204mV) DC.  Every possible effect has been explained in my web forum. Twelve months of always measuring a DC voltage while trying every different type of test to help explain where the DC voltage has led to one answer, that small signal semiconductor mathematics based on quantum physics is correct, that diodes *must* rectify ambient thermal noise.



PL

[PaulLowrance]

I created a thread, title What to do IF you invent a "Free Energy" machine

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/forum/index.php?topic=120.0