Why seek a God particle - when God doesn't exist?

[not_a_mib]

Even if there is no God, there may still be a Bob.  One could seek the Bob-particle, carrier of the slack-force, as described in Church of the SubGenius teachings.
http://www.subgenius.com/

Such particles may accumulate inside small droplets of tetrahydrocannibinol.  One of the SubGenius methods for obtaining slack is by inhaling smoke containing such droplets. 

A slight variation of the Millikan oil-drop experiment should suffice to determine whether slack is quantized, the minimum amount of it, and whether it follows an inverse-square force law.

[ScaryTruth]

And they found that the values measured were always exact multiples of the same number. They interpreted this as the charge on a single electron at 1.602 × 10âˆ'19 coulomb (SI unit for electric charge). Another example of the countless aspects of nature dismissed as "just the way things are". All denoting mere happenstance, but most importantly, unequivical proof that the concept of God - or Bob - or design - is ostensibly absurd.

The absence of evidence being far from evidence of absence - except in many things science, it appears. If they can't find it, it's still to be taken for granted. If it's not explained or understood - it's still mere accident - only another aspect of the 'meaningless' properties found throughout nature.

Of course, in retrospect, what the scriptures, gospels and holy texts [especially in the hands of man and institution] have managed to do to spirituality aspects out the galore, who can blame science in it's attemt to fill the credibility vacuum?

Would Heisenberg be any more certain, in the modern day, with his uncertaintly principle?

In regards to tetrahydrocannabinol, despite the use of 'doood' quite a bit and extensive crunching noises - even with nary an ancient text in the vicinity, contemplation of a potential Bob or close facsimile seems widespread.