Video you probably did not see

[raburgeson]

I haven't tried this yet, it's got to be good, they killed this on the net very completely. Hey I saved a copy and have a link. I want you to notice the spin is the same as this other video's ufo spin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFKdEy33SO4

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=57X9DKJN

I don't have a cell phone and won't have one in my presence, or any other device that can be turned on remotely by the government. It's why I haven't tried it yet. The fact that it disappeared so completely from the net speaks volumes. Curious the glass didn't have a larger mouth. The 2 pennies taped on the bottom create a capacitance and the larger copper coin in the glass creates another one. That's an assumption. The cell phone provides AC and the batteries DC. well look it over.

I have built a Joe's cell and think I'll take another look at it. This may validate a claim of a 4th mode of operation. Might be that the voltage drop the length of the cylinders is not enough under standard operation and the cylinder materials may need to be changed or the unknown capacitance of the water is not high enough or low enough to cause the tube like structure to produce the required AC voltages and frequencies to work in antigravity mode.

I'm totally jerked by the action of the government and their campaign to remove any information that will cause advancements in technology. I have to go and make a video available on a news post now, check out the update to that post.

[tinu]

I haven't tried this yet, it's got to be good, they killed this on the net very completely.
...

OMG! 
One movie is fake and the other is meant to be a joke (a bad one, grossly insulting the Scottish inventors).
Doh…
Maybe you need to take a break, to let it go and stop wasting everyone’s time and bandwidth.
Oh, one more kind advice: buy yourself a cell phone; it helps communicating and getting informed.

Cheers,
Tinu

[Shanti]

@tinu:

Who said the Mexican UFO is fake and on what facts?
I don't know if it's fake or not, and I also do not really care. But I'm curious.
And after a search on the net on this, I found both statements for telling it's fake and telling it's not, but neither of them based on  any usable fact.

So if you do have any valuable information, why this is fake I would be grateful to hear it. As I don't want to spend too much time in search engines, just for my curiosity...

@raburgeson:
Sensed reality is created in the brain. So if you think, all people and governments are bad, you will always see it that way.
"You always see, what you expect to see!"

[khabe]

I have seen several times paranormal  cases,  twice was real UFO-s. First time I was 12 yo, next time was 30 years later. It did not rotate and flappering - first one - it did stay near two hours, very clear and stable, on the sky may be 500m... maybe 1000m of altitude we saw it at 45 degrees to up , it was below of cloud...  smooth metal-look surface, no doors, no windows, no lamps ...  ...and suddenly it  flied away - very fast!!!!! and noiseless. It was on the border of sea, with me was two same age friends and perhaps 12 totally stiffened Russian soldiers included lieutenant, country I lived was occupied this time. Later UFO, I have to believe it was  , I met as adult man at night time, It was very complicated, weird and unbelievable story - I have told about to some persons, I do not want to publish this case.
The only thing what I want to tell you - once seen in reality - next time you can forthwith detect the fake.
This is fake,
cheers,
khabe

[Shanti]

Thank you for your story.
But your argument is unfortunately not very stable.

If someone who doesn't know what a plane is, saw a Concorde and later a F15. Then you show him a video of a Cessna, he would say, that this is definitely not a plane, but just a fake, for planes look and fly differently...

Additionally: If it would really be true, then it would definitely be a prototype, or it has a malfunction.
What speaks against the prototype is the year of the sighting...(quite new)
So if it's true then IMHO it has a malfunctioning in the precessing control.
And so the movement would certainly look quite different than usually...