Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Interactive Magnetic Oscillation tested by TUV & UL

Started by vonwolf, December 27, 2008, 10:23:03 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

vonwolf

December 27, 2008, 10:23:03 PM
   I came across this at Peswiki;
    "TUV Rheinland of North America and UL testing show the same curve of Input Power versus Output Power, with several places where the output rises to as much as three times the input. "
   Here's the link- http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Disturbed_Self-Compensating_Symmetry#Independent_Testing

   I just wanted to get some opinions on this, UL listing are usually legit. I hope I'm not dragging up a long dead topic.

     Pete

Yucca

#1
December 28, 2008, 03:11:55 PM
Hi,

I have looked at this device carefuly, I just don´t understand why his "output" torque sensor is located WITHIN the system rather than on the true output shaft.

TUV and UL have audited his torque sensors and logging equipment and verified that all readings are correct. But to call torque sensor 2 an output is incorrect in my opinion and neither TUV or UL did call it an output, they just verified that (RPM2 * torque sensor 2) showed greater average power than (RPM1 * torque sensor 1) an effect caused by measuring WITHIN a resonant system.

It has already been discussed a little in this thread:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5923.10

Best, Yucca.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions