Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

[hartiberlin]

Hi NRGfromthevacuum,

great new results from your new 2 videos !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhS4TxP29mM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RGgrkMocCo

In the last one one can see:

Great results, you are well overunity with these measurements.
If the chargeup cap in the background is 30 uF,
then in one test, where the blue cap had 23 Volts
you charged up the 30 uF cap to 373 Volts at minute 1:47 and this is an energy of about 2 .08 Wattseconds( Joules).
Now the blue cap lost at this moment just about 1 Volt, so 22 Volts were left in the cap.
When I did not make any calculation error the
blue cap went from 1.98 Wattseconds to 1.81 Wattseconds, so it just lost only 0.17 Wattseconds.
So you have a COP of:
2.08 Joules output  / 0.17 Joules input  = about 12  !

Great results !

Regards, Stefan.

[hartiberlin]

Well, Just try to see, how much voltage your blue cap increases, if you put your charge from the 30uF cap into the blue cap!
If the blue cap charges up higher as the starting voltage you have shown, that it indeed works OU !

Regards, Stefan.

[capthook]

Well it sure is nice to see someone measuring input!
And some nice test equipment too.
And using a capacitor as the input rather than a battery is most excellent.

Stefan:

I think NRG is a different person than the first video post.
And as to the calculations you posted - I'm assuming this portion of the test was an outlyer (#3), a mistake or something.  He didn't comment on it and quickly reset it to try again.  And the results are in no way similar to the other ones.

Attached is a screenshot of an excel spreadsheet listing the test results.

The 4th test show 110% output over input....

The question is: what size capacitor is the capture capacitor?  He says on the first video he's using a 30uF cap, but doesn't say on the second.  Sure look huge for 30uF - but guess he says they are 4000V?

And why such a wide range of results?

[capthook]

Looking closer:

Test #3 is:

-37.38 volts?

So #3 should be disregarded.  It was really just a preparation for test #4 (or #3 if you now relabel)

But still, #4 apparantly shows a 10% gain.... hmmm, wonder why....
Is the coil still hooked up in these tests?
And is the coil still hooked up to the battery?
And the pulse time of #4 was much shorter than #1 and #2 as evidenced by the smaller power input.
(1/2 the pulse as test #1)

P.S. It would be nice to have a wider view so as to see how the pulses are done and what leads are being used.
I see the yellow lead from the capacitor...
And the green lead.. isn't that from the battery?
etc. etc.

[capthook]

And until further information is provided by NRG:

Something is very inconsistent.

1.  Why the -37 volts?  A pulse from the battery of opposite polarity than the input capacitor?

2.  A shorter pulse indicates a greater efficiency.  However, test #2 was a shorter pulse than #1 and shows a lower efficiency.

These two things (and the inability to see the whole experiment) indicate to me something is screwy..