Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

[PaulLowrance]

Hi  PaulLowrance

that's a big clam
NO one here has OU   Do you ? I do not see it

where is your device

cat

BTW, yes to that question. For over one year I've had the first documented and properly tested "free energy" machine that includes the extreme details, including part #'s, to build. It's not going to power anything useful, but you all may know it to be my diode array. Someone who's first name starts with a "T" dragged me away from my magnetic research over two years ago when I was just months away from building my first magnetic based "free energy" machine. Mr. "T" asked me to test his diode array. I replied, but didn't answer his question because I did not want to get caught up in diode research.  He asked again. I ignored. He asked 3rd time, and I finally gave in, and the rest is history. It was all a waste of time with the exception that I have undeniable proof that 2LoT is a tendency, not a law!

Make no mistake. My diode research is the thing of the past, and I *will* have a self-running machine that produces usable amounts of power by the end of this year. The mathematics is from well-established conventional physics. It is very clear. It matches my magnetic theory. I took my magnetic theory, made a design in FEMM, ran the sim, and FEMM numbers came back in agreement with my magnetic theory. It will work!

Was I bamboozled?  I have my own opinion about that. It's funny the perfect timing these people have. What's hilarious is that I am now *LITERALLY* being bombarded with people begging me to help them out in their stuff. Please Give Up People!  Not Going To Happen!!

You legit posters have no clue what's happening behind the scenes. A lot of these people you think are your friends are here to pull the wool over your eyes, to misguide you. Sorry if that hurts, but I speak my mind.

So why am I still posting here. The same reason I've always come here. To find legit people ... while I run my numerical analysis simulations in the background, LOL

Global Free Energy in 2009!

PL

p.s., Please copy all of the pages at my website. You may need them in a few months. Please! If by infinitesimal chance I don't make it over the next few months, then it's up to all of you folks. I don't know why, but all of a sudden today the router has been under a heavy attack, and just broke through. My ZoneAlarm is now giving me warnings every 30 seconds or so. Since 1997 I've been a SA on unix servers, so I know a thing or two about PC & Internet security.

[Magnethos]

Congratulations PL, but we need to develop more devices and techniques.

Video showing how the device works
http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=47082727717444502&hl=es

[Magnethos]

Some calculations to determine the COP.

Information Needed to determine the COP:
Example 1-> 250 Volts, 3000 microfarads, 1 MHz. The battery can be a simple 1.5 Volt battery. But in that case we need to add a voltage multiplier or a transformer to increase from 1.5 to 250 V and charge the caps.

1) Capacitor Voltage: 250 Volts
2) Capacitor Farads: 3000 microfarads = 0.003 Farads
3) Switching Time: 1.000.000 Hz = 0,000001 secs

Q = C x V                  Q = 0.003 x 250 =  0.75 C
W = (Q x V) / 2          W = 0.75 x 250 =  93.75 J
P = W / T..... T = W / P

Can the device run a 50,000 Watt device?
T = W / P                 T = 93.75 / 50.000 = 0,001875 secs

We can pulse the battery up to 0,000001 secs
0,001875 secs < 0,000001 secs  so we can run a 50.000 Watt device using the battery.
The maximum energy using this configuration (250V@3000 microfarads, 1 Mhz, 1 AA battery) is around 75.000 Watt.

I'm not 100% sure, but I think the calculations are correct.

[PaulLowrance]

Magnethos,

What I'm doing is using well-established mathematical equations from conventional physics. I have no clue what you all of your numbers come from, or what theory it is based on, but in your video you talk about energy from the vacuum.

People should know the difference -->

1. My quest is to capture ambient thermal energy that exists in all matter, all the time. I've used a well established magnetics software, FEMM, that uses well established conventional physics that shows my designs have a gain in energy per cycle.

2. Your quest is to capture energy from the vacuum. There is no conventional mathematics that shows how this is possible.

So my research is no longer a theory, as it is based on well established conventional physics mathematics.

PL

[Magnethos]

Paul,
I'm very surprised and happy that anyone (you) have developed a free energy, overunity... call it as you want, energy device. That is a very good news for all the entire community. I'm waiting to see the tests of your device in the next months.

The theory is about the relaxation time constant in a conductor. That theory is well stablished in conventional physics, maybe a little uncommon but that theory is explained in common physics.

In the project, I'm showing a way to extract pure voltage from the battery. Again, this "advantage" is based in the Relaxation Time theory, based in common physics. We know if we don't extract current from the battery, we will have an unlimited source of energy. Of course, there is a degradation of the battery in the Years, but we can replace the battery each 3 or 4 years and the problem will be resolved.

The voltage in a battery is infinite. So, I think the dipole is getting potential continously from somewhere and I think the potential comes from the vacuum. Maybe the potential comes from another source. But we know the voltage in a battery is infinite and we can extract all the voltage we want from the dipole without discharging the battery.

This quest is to capture pure voltage from the battery, not directly from the vacuum.