Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Started by Tito L. Oracion, February 06, 2009, 01:45:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 119 Guests are viewing this topic.

ramset

Loner
Hope you feel better soon.
Here is recent interesting comment From Armagd03
regarding Slyders lighting bulbs around the yard wirelessly.


Quote
Things like that can be possible because there really is no such thins as electricities of opposite polarities. There is only potential with respect to the environment, and other potentials. You can have two positive potentials with a net difference between them and still have current. The designation of each of those being labeled positive is with reference to environment or ground. If you remove this from the picture, they still behave as the so called + and - designating a net difference.


------------
Playing with "potentials"
?
Thx
Chet
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

Tito L. Oracion

Quote from: pauldude000 on January 31, 2013, 10:50:40 PM
Tito, say you need to crack an egg. There are many ways to crack an egg. You can use a light tap with the edge of a knife or fork. You can use a sledgehammer. You can build a Rube Goldberg machine. All three will crack an egg.


Which is more efficient, and why do people trying to figure out how to crack an egg use sledgehammers and Goldberg machines?


Actually, i don't crack the egg, i just make a hole and use a straw and suck it  ;) ;D

and its so efficient and yummy ;D  lol

Tito L. Oracion

Quote from: Neo-X on January 31, 2013, 01:03:14 AM
No problemo amigo
Its just like a test of faith
Tito is almost giving up the secret

- End of Quote -

I dont believe in tito. I think he was toying with us. He already said that he was pinochio. :D


no!, i'm pi-neo-x-kio ;D

Bob Smith

Imagine a big egg hanging over your head, and you are starving, but you have a steel straw. The problem is that every time you poke the straw thru the shell, the shell heals in milliseconds, and only lets out a drop of yummy egg. You poke it as fast as humanly possible, but all you get is a few teaspoons that just don't get enough to take the edge off the hunger.  But you get your mother's electric sewing machine, hold it over your head and poke the egg at the highest speed possible. The machine starts humming and the egg starts to shake.  Now the egg drops are coming out the holes so fast that all you have to do is open your mouth, and you have more than your fill (until your mother comes home and finds you holding her sewing machine over your head, and wet egg all over the room. Then you're in trouble).  :)
Bob

Magluvin

Quote from: Neo-X on February 01, 2013, 08:45:07 PM
Hi guys... I was planning to build this one. What can u say would this work?

Hey Neo

Ive played with this some. When the input coil is off, 'most' of the magnets field is in the core to the left. I say 'most' because, well, just because.  :o ;D   lol. But really, put 'some' iron object close to that gap at the right and there is field on the right side also. Not as much as the left, but a substantial amount.

Here is the first of a series of vids I did on the very subject of 'most' or 'some'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Vj0PvRJssA

Now we look at how much field is produced by the input (switching coil) coil and how much is actually switched over from the left of the core to the right.

Would there be more 'magnet' field switched over, from the left to the right, than the amount, or say strength of field, produced by the input(switching) coil? In my case, I dont believe so.

There may be alternative ways of driving it or different coil winding styles that could make it work. But as is, when the input coil is on, forcing 'some' of the core magnets field to the right, there is still some of that magnets field to the left in the core, especially if the magnets field is stronger than the magnets strength.

So mostly, if the amount of magnet field switched is not more than the switching coils field, then we are better off just using the field produced by the input coil to induce the pickup coils, without the need to purchase the magnet and make the core to fit. ;)


I made the first solid state orbo while the idea was still just being discussed. Youtube search for "Orbonbon"  The input(switching) coil causes the inner core, that the central magnets are using as a path from N to S, to become saturated, becoming nearly invisible to the magnets. The magnets field jumps to the outer core when the switching coil is powered. In doing so, the fields of the magnet 'cut' through the pickup coil that is  between the inner and outer cores, producing output. And of course, when the switch coil power is turned off, the magnets field will switch back to the inner core, as it is no longer invisible and the shortest path, 'cutting' the pickup coil windings again, producing output.

Mags