Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Started by Tito L. Oracion, February 06, 2009, 01:45:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

void109

Mags,

I agree, low power, small individual units is the way to go.  I just couldn't figure out a way to get those abrupt on's and off's (yet) so a spark gap seemed a reasonably easy thing to set up and tune, to remove the manual switching.  I'm going to keep looking for a way to get the abrupt switching with a low power solid state circuit design as well.

I may be able to throw together a high voltage proof of concept device easily, I'll have to rummage through parts - could use halogen lights as a load ala Kapagen.

I've had limited time to work on this as well, always torn between doing the work that pays the power bill, or doing the work that may remove the power bill altogether :)

Magluvin

Hey Void

I think mosfets in parallel can give good switching.    Unless you have tried it.  Remember, if you are worried about freq with the fets, they wont be operating at the freq of the lrc, it will be much lower than that. It should be on for as long as it takes to empty the cap, then wait.  I will be at it in a bit, im in need of sustenance.  Fewd!   lol 

I just got an Alienware laptop from my buddy. Was from the original co.  Gateway owns them now I think.
I have been running this sim on my 1.6ghz pc. I wanna see the diff.   This laptop is huge, but packed for gaming.
He got a new something so I got this cheap.

Mags

Magluvin

I tried the mfets and I didnt like the way things worked.  The fet or fets seemed to not deliver to the coil from the cap no where close to a switch. Tried 4 in parallel and no better.  But I do have an issue with how it worked otherwise also. It drew current from the battery in gobs, but wont deliver to the coil?  And this was hooked up the same place as the switch in correct polarity also. 

I rigged it up using a "switch" and resistors to just see what the source and drain would do. It continues to conduct after releasing the switch.  I tried putting the fets in a different place on the black board yet with same connections, but same results. That was just to test the sim for stupid errors from having wire crossings, but was consistent.

So then I came up with another Idea today. Well, remembered someone elses idea, Tesla Igniter Pat.   I think it is possible that the 2mh inductor is too much for the fets.  But where I see them do very well is in pwm supplies, where mostly the primary of the transformer or inductor really isnt anything near the 2mh coil I have. Just a few or more turns on the primary.   Soooo,  we activate the oscillations with a primary coil of low no. of turns and heavy wire, say 10 awg or bigger.   I am going at it right now on the sim.  The cutoff still needs to happen. The primary cannot be a drag on the secondary after the cycles have started, so it has to disconnect until it is ready to to take a discharge again.  In other words, if the primary is not connected to anything, the secondary will just act as an inductor.

In any case, I am just going to try the fets on a small henry transformer primary and see if there are any differences.   Well, maybe I can just lower my henrys in my circuit.  Me dumdum. 

Be back

Mags

Magluvin

here is an interesting thing. This circuit could be a tpu. I dunno.   If the inductor has an opposition to current changes, then if we have a diode and load resistor, then KICK the coil,  well just load the code in the sim.

Just tap the switch and watch the first scope vs last scope   these show first power input on left and load output on right.   Then tap more, fast  slow,   Is this as easy as it gets er wut.  lol    I can say that this is very very easy to try in the real world. 

I also got some good mosfet switching happening now. I should have something to show tomorrow.

But for this lil code here, what are some thoughts out there.  =]


Mags

Magluvin

Was thinking about these resistive loads and what to do of it.  If they were heaters, and we were able to tune these things right, you could boil water for a steam engine. Err whatever needs heat.  But instead of a steam engine to provide motive force, we change out the inductor from my last circuit code, to a dc motor, Or my first circuit code for ac induction motors. The motors would need to be impedance matching for best results. The resistor loads need to be fine tuned also, to get the most out of the output.  Could that be what Tesla did in the Peirce Arrow? Big 80hp AC induction motor. Could the motor be the inductor, add a big diode and spike that thing.   Kinda crazy.

Mags Crazy