ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[a.king21]

Hi A.King,

Steinmetz also mentioned that you want the e and b field to collapse simultaneously to create the largest transient. This is one reason I think semiconductor switching will not work as well. Semiconductors add a latency to both the e and b field instead of collapsing together, like a mechanical switch or spark gap, the fields collapse out of phase with each other depending on the capacitance/inductive value of coil. Tesla was trying to make a fast spark gap to remove as much latency as possible and increase switching speed.

Yes I agree but there are workarounds, and I'm considering a few.
Ie pulse a small electromagnet to operate a reed switch, use a toy motor with magnets attached to operate a reed.
Alternatively wire up a relay imhotep style. Use a transistor switch to pulse a relay.
Because the Tesla igniter patent can be operated at low voltages it might be possible to use transistors to
short the cap and capture the radiant spike elsewhere away from trouble.
In the end I may consider using valve tubes. Possibly also capacitor ignition systems.
It's just a question of looking around and considering the options.
At the moment I am using a home made Tesla switching system as per the igniter patent.
It might be possible to use a simple electric motor and short through the brushes as per the ozone patent.
Also some transistors have built in flywheels to protect them, which creates an undamped wave.
Anyhow, maybe Steinmetz understood Tesla but not many  contemporaries understood Tesla as he pointed out several times.
They were all still marveling at AC and  Hertz waves, whereas Tesla had moved on by 1898.
We are still trying to catch up.
Sad, isn't it. We should be travelling round the galaxy by now if science had been allowed to progress.

[Dave45]

Somebody needs to keep this thread alive.

Im still playin with the mazzilli, using a clamp meter  Im showing 50 in 50 out so not bad but not good enough.
I noticed when I switch connections on one primary the circuit doesnt work, I have been trying to figure out why, I think this is why the two primary's start working together and this lets no bemf reflect into the primary's, since no bemf is entering the primary's its not triggering the mosfet gates through the diodes.

No bemf in the primary means no reactive power, Im going to move the diode from the primary to the secondary and see what goes up in smoke 

[a.king21]

I'm going back to basics. One switch at a time. 1 circuit change at a time.
Slow and tedious, but the only way.
Got my Tesla switches working at last, so plenty of permutations.
I now work with  a cap bank paralleled  to the source battery - that way there's
no mistake re ou. You simply swap out the battery from time to time and see what the cap bank is doing.

[a.king21]

Tito:
"

Next time if i'm in good mood, i will share one of my best discovery : "The Power of Two"This is very easy, very practical and absolutely can be done by everyone. There is no switching in this tech.      merry ChristmasGod Bless     "


Are you in a good mood yet??    ? ? ? ? ? ?

[Reiyuki]

Capacitance is superluminal, right?  Roughly 1.5c in most environments.
  Konstantin Meyl, Eric Dollard, Don Smith, Bob Boyce, and others all make reference to this.

Inductance is slow and lossy.  Inductive storage is better but still loses energy quickly.


If we pulse a transformer we get a small period of capacitive coupling followed by conventional inductive coupling.  Perhaps this coupling is the kick?

So, is it possible to either harvest or boost through capacitive coupling between the two windings and redirect it for use later in the circuit?

Lets try using a few components to separate the inductive coupling from the capacitive coupling.


Happy hunting,
- Reiyuki