ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Tito L. Oracion]

Using some what?    Nature timing?

Would this be more correct...   i'm just using a very simple components as much as possible like what tesla is using in his days. but for the sake of size i'm using some Nature timing.   =]


Mags

yES! of course, cause we have to use in our device were it is behaving better ok; 

[forest]

@forest

             CHEEEEEEERS! 

   just teach mags what you have bud. 

That is what i'm saying, in time you got it, then thats the time you realize what i'm saying is right. isn't it?

i think what you need now is a refinement of your design and some correct  materials and places for components and that is i think where we have to be differ if whose the best design ok; 

Just last tip: it is better for our device that it can able to receive or detect signals easily so that the source is stable ok 

No more tips now, just try and think which is best or correct materials ok.


now you have the version one of tesla's amplifier.
the second one is more brilliant. => rolling stone ice just notice how nature works.


sir wattsup is very correct for we have 1 volt forever but that is a long method.
but here is what i say "THERE IS ALWAYS A BETTER WAY" AND "THERE IS ALWAYS A VERY GOOD SOLUTION OF ATLEAST ONE "


bye. 

SO LONG FEL;D

Tito
I think you are talking about "ring twice" version as a second one ,right ?
My device is not working as I wish right now ,no OU, the speed of motor is not stable and I have problems to make it like Adams motor nature timing    because my magnets are glued on top cd disc not on edge, have to build wood handle for pushing coil above disc.
also reed switch that one with inert gas inside is not good  sparking probably to weak for my 400V capacitor discharge.
but... I have so many ideas .... 

have to find a nice big cap maybe 10000 uF 50V hmm
also would that be nice : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC8-o1jm5Zo ?

damn I'm so slow in building anything 

[Magluvin]

Ring Twice?   Is that refering to how many cycles that we let hapen before we kickit again?

Mags

[Magluvin]

Here is a sim circuit that I just put up for Gyula on another thread.


It uses my precharge circuit from early on with the addition of a diode to let the inductors flywheel action pump a cap to higher voltage than the source, without the extra that is above the source voltage coming from the source, as I described it earlier.

Its a very simple circuit. If we hold the switch till the cap is full, all of the energy comes from the source, even if the cap is higher in voltage than the source, because of the inductors flywheel effect.

But lets say we release the switch when the cap is at 20v, the inductor is not done yet, flywheel action, and starts to pull the charge from the other side of the cap instead of the source, through the additional diode near the source.  The amount of energy to charge the cap to 20v in this manor is equal to charging the cap manually to 20v. But here we use the inductors inertia, to pump the cap to a higher voltage than the source AFTER cutting off the source,  anything higher than 20v in the cap is free. Guaranteedy.  =]

$ 1 5.0E-6 0.551975421667673 57 5.0 43
s 640 192 704 192 0 1 true
c 432 464 640 464 0 1.4999999999999999E-5 9.999999999999332E-4
v 704 464 704 192 0 0 40.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
r 640 464 704 464 0 1.0
l 432 192 640 192 0 1.0 6.39679282863122E-23
d 432 192 432 464 1 0.805904783
d 640 464 640 192 1 0.805904783
o 2 8 0 35 20.0 9.765625E-5 0 -1
o 1 8 0 35 0.009765625 9.765625E-5 1 -1


Mags

[IWD]

Almost same setup I have on the desk right now(the triger is mosfet and timing is variable by me), and i can say: that intertia of the inductor will charge teh capacitor better (higer value) when you keep it flow acros batery like clasical joulthief, it suck more charges from the batery, tension of the batery+ tension on the inductor.