ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[CuriousChris]

Curious Chris:
How is Tom Bearden a fraud?
I think you should back your statement up with facts, don't you?

Fact 1/ Overunity is impossible tried and true
Fact 2/ Tom Bearden claims overunity
Fact 3/ Tom Bearden makes money off his false claims

ipso facto Tom Bearden is a fraud!

According to this site he is also loony

http://americanloons.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/480-tom-bearden.html

[Tito L. Oracion]

Fact 1/ Overunity is impossible tried and true
Fact 2/ Tom Bearden claims overunity
Fact 3/ Tom Bearden makes money off his false claims

ipso facto Tom Bearden is a fraud!

According to this site he is also loony

http://americanloons.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/480-tom-bearden.html

if so then what is this:





« Reply #30 on: June 03, 2014, 04:34:47 PM »




Quote from: CuriousChris on June 03, 2014, 02:20:40 PM

Yes that's exactly what the cap does. No matter what switch you use when opening a switch to an inductor you need to protect it from the massive voltage spike.

I don't doubt your tiny picofarad ceramic capicitor is totally destroying the overunity effect. Thats why we in the government teach everyone to use capacitors in
spark quench circuits. It's really a clever ruse to hide overunity.

I guess these clever people here have discovered our secret. We will have to shut down this forum and arrange for everyone who has ever read it 'have accident to protect our control.

<sub>Please do not encourage people to research into negative reactance devices.

i'm really curious. lol</sub>

[Tito L. Oracion]

Did you not go to school?

Surely your teacher taught you that if you cite a source you must provide the reference to that for fact checking.

You can scream as much as you like about what Telsa said but unless you provide some reference to actual quotes it is meaningless. more so I say it is deliberate and deceptive.

If you cannot provide the reference then he never said it.

If you provide the reference I will be able to explain how what Telsa MAY have said has been taken out of context.

Again I reiterate Tesla never said a condensor can develop infinite energy. Telsa said many things. Some of them we consider plainly ridiculous like he believed in martians. But when it came to electricity the guy had no equal.

Because of that much of what he said has been misinterpreted, Then and now.

Telsa is a favourite subject of mine. So for you to tell lies about what he said is extremely upsetting and it NEEDS clarification. So many of the fools on this forum invoke Tesla's name for their stupid claims. All they are doing is trying to fool people like you and me. They don't fool me!

I reiterate if you are going to cite someone else's work then provide a reference. Thats how science is done. Its not done by hearsay and bogus claims. We have a name for that too. Its called Pseudoscience.

No need for reference ok, i experience it already and it is true that caps can supply indefinite energy!

[CuriousChris]

Yes that's exactly what the cap does. No matter what switch you use when opening a switch to an inductor you need to protect it from the massive voltage spike.

I don't doubt your tiny picofarad ceramic capicitor is totally destroying the overunity effect. That's why we in the government teach everyone to use capacitors in
spark quench circuits. It's really a clever ruse to hide overunity.

I guess these clever people here have discovered our secret. We will have to shut down this forum and arrange for everyone who has ever read it 'have accident to protect our control.

I hope you are really not citing this as something other than a statement of fact followed by a tongue in cheek dig at all the idiots that claim its all a coverup.
Just in case you are truly stupid. Voltage does not equal Energy. Just the same as power does not equal energy and I'll throw this one in Current does not equal Energy.

No need for reference ok, i experience it already and it is true that caps can supply indefinite energy!

That then proves you actually don't know do you. You cannot reference it because you never actually heard it. you make up lies and upon those lies you hope to fool others.

Sorry mate I call it as I see it you are fraud and a fake.

[Marsing]

Fact 1/ Overunity is impossible tried and true

as long as  the source is unknown, it could be considered as overunity, soon enough as it was accepted by mainstream, it would not considered as overunity anymore.

Fact 2/ Tom Bearden claims overunity

of  course, as you see why overunity is possible, he think that he was the first, read above.

Fact 3/ Tom Bearden makes money off his false claims

false claims !!!, read bold text again.

ipso facto Tom Bearden is a fraud!

According to this site he is also loony

http://americanloons.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/480-tom-bearden.html

not every page  found in web contain useful info, it's also contain a crap/rubbish.
everyone can write a blog and fill with  whatever they want. you can do too if you wish.
everyone searching overunity can be considered as a crazy/loony, because mainstream say it impossible.