ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Marsing]

Overunity is possible?

Prove it!

Define your own understanding of overunity first. i have showed mine.

[MileHigh]

Forest:

It's the same riddle as you can see now with exaples of incredible devices from Akula or Lasersaber. It looks the same , ordinary but only Lasersaber can make it so efficient, that's the big pain for us to understand.

There should be no mystery if someone does a planned set of measurements on Lasersaber's circuit.  It should all be understandable by doing a thorough investigation.  It's something that should not be that difficult to do.

Akula on the other hand is a fraud.  There has been a couple of months work done by the replicators with no success.  I think the reasonable assumption is hidden batteries or similar tricks.

MileHigh

[Dave45]

Two pages of bs, really
You dont have circuits to study, test
Work together help each other
Discuss the workings of a circuit,
Learn
Teach
Discuss

good grief
what a waste of time

[Bob Smith]

@Dave45 - Well-said! 

Here's a blast from the past that's really worth checking out and bookmarking (i.e., the link).
Bob

hi everyone! good day! 

I just want to share this library that helps me a lot!
There's a lot of infos here, hope it'll help a little in your FE adventure. 

http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?&p=how+to+build+a+free+energy+device&rs=0ni=20&fr=yfp-t-701-s&fr2=

[Farmhand]

Lasersaber's circuits are not O.U., If you want confirmation of the fact his circuits are not O.U. then Just ask him, clearly and directly.

I already did ask him if any of his circuits showed O.U. or greater than 100% efficient and he replied and he said no, as he was asked a direct question he gave a direct answer.

A 25 Farad capacitor charged to 5 volts contains more potential energy than a 20 mAh 3.7 volt battery.  And should run a circuit drawing tiny power for some hours.

In some recent tests I found that if the LED's are supplied just over their conduction voltage they use a tiny amount of power, as the voltage supplied is increased the amount of current through them increases but at some point the gain in brightness is not linear with the extra power supplied.

ie, if I run 4 x 5 mm LED's with 10.6 volts across them they are fairly bright but not fully "bright" then if I try to increase the voltage the current increases a lot without very much increase in brightness.

OK so 4 x 5 mm LED's and to calculate--- 1 mA at lets just say 10 volts = 0.01 Watts, a 25 Farad capacitor charged to 5 volts contains 312 Joules. So the LED's can run for   31,000 seconds, or if we divide by 60 twice we get 8.66 hours. How could anyone tell the difference in brightness over the length of a video ? And they can run from less and appear fairly bright to look at but for practical light output they need over 11 volts across them and the input/output power goes up lot to go from 10.6 volts across them to 11.6 volts across them.

All Lasersaber's circuits do is use an amount of stored energy to "partially" drive some LED's with a tiny amount of power.

Now if he could get a Farad sized or above capacitor to charge up while lighting 4 x 5 mm led's using 0.01 Watts continuous input I would be surprised.

If we supply the LED's with DC and actually measure the amount of power it takes to light the LED's to be seemingly bright but use as little power as possible (adjusting power by efficient way) then we can calculate the energy dissipation to achieve that.

Does anyone see any output power measurements shown by Lasersaber ?

I say he should measure the power through the LED's so we can see how long they would run from a given amount of stored potential energy in a capacitor.

Until then it's just ooohs and aaahhhhs.

..