ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[TinselKoala]

Torque is not measured in Watts.

[minnie]

  Yes Watts,
                 overunity is measured in watts of TALK, not torque!!!

[wattsup]

@TK

It all boils down to torque.

wattsup

[minnie]

  Joke.

[citfta]

Jack was a member of this forum for some years. We helped him finance the patent but then he passed away and I have never been able to find any family members that might know where his devices are.

You can look him up on this forum and I have saved some of his stuff on my FTP site here
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Inventors/Jack-W-Hildenbrand/

Although we never had the opportunity to formally run and measure his motors, in all the "purported" OU devices I have seen during the many years on this forum, his was the only one I could openly say had 99.99% chance of being truly OU.  If I remember correctly his smaller motor used around 200 watts to run and produced 750 watts of torque.

But in order to try and build this, a person needs to be a top machinist like him.

If anyone has the time to hunt down his family and see who inherited all his devices, and, report back here, it would be a very good deed for the posterity of the OU effort.

wattsup

I think I am going to have to reconsider my opinion about his motor.  He did some beautiful machine work.  If his motors ran as well as they looked they were works of art.  Thanks for providing that link wattsup.

I do think a small milling machine and lathe could make the version 1 of his motor shown in one of the pictures you saved and also shown in the patent.  Machining the laminations would be a bit of a challenge but with careful work it could be done.  It is done every day in industry.

Carroll