Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Started by Tito L. Oracion, February 06, 2009, 01:45:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 24 Guests are viewing this topic.

XR IX

Quote from: onepower on May 06, 2020, 01:57:08 PM

As well, Tesla's Earthquake Machine was simply a very efficient oscillator. It didn't dissipate large amounts of energy but conserved it so the pulse strength could grow larger with each impulse. When the strength of the impulses became very large it started tearing stuff apart. The lesson here is not so much resonant oscillations but conserving the energy present and building it up to extreme levels. It is the extreme level of energy present which tears stuff apart not simply oscillations.

Think of nuclear fusion, a small energy input releases a larger amount of energy. Where did the energy come from?, the input only excited something already present which contained more energy. Thus we did not create energy we simply used the input to transform something already present and the transformation released a larger amount of energy. Nothing can be created or destroyed only transformed... this is the way.

Regards

onepower, I think you have many good points, and one bad one.

Conservation of Momentum [Good]: Tesla did say that you can store the energy, so think of this we can create an almost perfect storage of energy. If you think of how efficient batteries are you see the genius in what Tesla made.

Quote from: Nikola Tesla
I do so, but I prefer to reduce those waves in quantity and pass a current into the earth, because electromagnetic wave energy is not recoverable while that [earth] current is entirely recoverable, being the energy stored in an elastic system

Unknown Impact to Earth's Dynamics [Good]: I think Tesla came up with some system, but of course with the mentality of his time, he couldn't grasp the environmental impact. As you said he built an Earth quake machine, but didn't know it could bring down a building or split the Earth, change the rotation, many unforeseen consequences that today we can model and theorize impact.

But would it destroy the Earth when the process happens in everyday:

Quote from: Nikola Tesla
Many times, in regularly recurring intervals, the same actions were repeated until the storm which, as evident from simple computations, was moving with nearly constant speed, had retreated to a distance of about three hundred kilometers. Nor did these strange actions stop then, but continued to manifest themselves with undiminished force. Subsequently, similar observations were also made by my assistant, Mr. Fritz Lowenstein, and shortly afterward several admirable opportunities presented themselves which brought out, still more forcibly, and unmistakably, the true nature of the wonderful phenomenon. No doubt, whatever remained: I was observing stationary waves.

I think you maybe a little off on your nuclear fusion theory [Bad]: From what I gather from typical cafeteria talk fusion theory (which is truly out of my depth) nuclear fusion doesn't take a little amount of energy... and that's why all don't have one in our basement (unless you are Taylor Wilson). A thermonuclear bomb takes a fission bomb to compress and heat the deuterium and/or other fancy hydrogen isotopes in the second stage fusion reaction. So it seems a fourteen year old can create bursts of energy to make a fusion reaction happen, but making it happen requires sustained power. I like thinking about this stuff, but in the end, they had the answer in Cold Fusion, and das kapoot


Tito L. Oracion

Quote from: ramset on May 04, 2020, 09:46:08 AM
Tito,
I hope all is well in your part of the world...
Mr XR-X1 guy above makes a good contribution towards understanding a possible gain mechanism,and honestly your "plug" a nice small tester for this.
You play games with peoples lives ...hope your having fun.



Chet K
>:( i 'm not playing games with peoples!!,
Ok, i'm telling the truth!!!
And this is actually tesla is
Trying to say to the world.
You know what , you destroy someone just because you don't know.
What ever!!! ;D
https://youtu.be/JxAMNzlUFFE
https://youtu.be/6ymnKOFYj6I


This is the truth! Start from small into an avalanche. ;)
i will not post anymore, cause you just makes me
Bad!!!
Bye! ;D


XR IX

Quote from: Tito L. Oracion on May 09, 2020, 05:34:31 AM
>:( i 'm not playing games with peoples!!,
Ok, i'm telling the truth!!!
And this is actually tesla is
Trying to say to the world.
You know what , you destroy someone just because you don't know.
What ever!!! ;D
https://youtu.be/JxAMNzlUFFE
https://youtu.be/6ymnKOFYj6I




This is the truth! Start from small into an avalanche. ;)
i will not post anymore, cause you just makes me
Bad!!!
Bye! ;D



Kamusta Tito,

Have you posted any diagrams, schematics, Bill of Materials needed to make a device?
Do you have a video of a functioning system perhaps?

[Disagree] Actually Tesla wasn't saying that at all. In fact it's that thought process that drives people down dead-end research. People end up building Tesla Coil devices, thinking that resonance alone arbitrarily creates over unity. That is in no way true, it wasn't true for Tesla. Tesla struggled to find a way to harness the energy from the ambient, he called it it ether.

IMHO He had two different ideas:

1) To store energy in a capacitor he built up, and release it in small duty cycle pulses. When you do that once across a transformer primary, you generate oscillations that you get for free. 

Quote from: Nikola Tesla
Energy stored in the condenser and discharged in an inconceivably small interval of time. You could not produce that activity with an undamped wave. The damped wave is of advantage because it gives you, with a generator of 1 kilowatt, an activity of 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, or 5,000 kilowatts; whereas, if you have a continuous or undamped wave, 1 kilowatt gives you only wave energy at the rate of 1 kilowatt and nothing more. That is the reason why the system with a quenched gap has become popular.

2) His TMT was actually using energy from a standing wave, but it is a system like an air-conditioner is a system - Not a single circuit. He wasn't using #1 and said so.

Quote from: Nikola Tesla
Counsel

Did you find that that was the best condition for transmitting energy without the use of wire?

Tesla

No, I did not use that method when I was transmitting energy. I used it only in the production of those freaks for which I have been called a magician. If I had used merely undamped waves, I would have been an ordinary electrician like everybody else.


XR IX

Please remember the Latin phrase:
QuoteCaveat emptor
let the buyer beware

Read, ask questions and comprehend what Nikola Tesla was trying to do.

Read this first: http://www.pbs.org/tesla/res/res_art08.html
pay attention after "...It was on the third of July--the date I shall never forget..."

Then read this: http://www.pbs.org/tesla/res/res_art07.html

If you comprehend what he is doing, I think you'll agree that you can take device that looks fairly simple (e.g. Kapanadze, Don Smith device)  because they are only parts of systems, and claim that the device is producing free energy, because it is attached to the load. That would be like looking at a lamp, and flipping the switch and saying the switch is producing free energy.