ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Tito L. Oracion]

well ....actualy he is at least not hiding behind egoistic excuses, he simply can, post this calculations without any problems, because we are on public forum, where we can learn from sucess and mistakes also, and that is the best way how move forward, beacause science never ends.
But who are you Tito? that you can criticise him??
you not posted anything that you can prove what you say.

and....when you pull-out something from context
you should say what you mean with it, because..Tesla realy make 1MW form 10W ...but he make it after 1M shorter time. that means ...let say for exaplme ..from 10watt second he make 0.00001 mega watsecond, or 1 MW microsecond. amoutn of energy is still same.

tesla made it in a continous way ok, you can make a lot of activity as he says in a full charge caps.


you are asking who i am? well simply i am capital TITO   


Didn't you not read that he provoke me  first, that is actually the wrong with you man! you! always looking the wrong that i've done but you did not see who made the first malicious thing! 

is computation still needed? if tesla already says the truth!
so you think tesla did it only for only 1M moment? is that your convincing knowledge? hmmm i think your also genius than tesla 

i think your ego is more than your face! 

[IWD]

"tesla made it in a continous way ok, you can make a lot of activity as he says in a full charge caps."

Point was, that you should not whip out things from context,or you should explain what you mean with it.

"Didn't you not read that he provoke me  first, that is actually the wrong with you man! you! always looking the wrong that i've done but you did not see who made the first malicious thing!  "

I read his arguments about what happening in video which you posted. (and which is not yours)
you have no reason to be angry, all what you need to do is post your arguments.
Somebodys arguments and views is actualy usual thing on public forum. That is the simple consequences.
If you are not able to accept it, then you should not post the video.(mainly if you are not able to explain it)
and in first place,.... you should not be angry.
and when you mention who made first maliciou thing... you evidently forget who severaly times promised something and then violate it, and after that, just lauging others effort.
of course you have absolute right to do it, but...point is ....you should be able to withstand the consequences.

"is computation still needed?"
computation is universal language, by it, you can explain manny things very easily, and when you know numbers of some system you can easily recognize what is going on., and mainly, what will be.

"tesla already says the truth!"

what truth??? I know manny truths.... another thing pull-out from context.
and tesla mainly used computations. If you realy read the colorado spring notes as you said, then you shloud know what is computation good for.

"so you think tesla did it only for only 1M moment?"
No... I do not think so, you say that.

"i think your ego is more than your face!"
wel...I am not the one who compare himself with Tesla, bedini and others, I do not call myself capital,  you did.
I am not the one who is enjoying attentions.
I am not the one who is offended unreasonably.
I am not the one who says I have truth and others have not.(and not even bother to face others arguments)

[Tito L. Oracion]

"tesla made it in a continous way ok, you can make a lot of activity as he says in a full charge caps."

Point was, that you should not whip out things from context,or you should explain what you mean with it.

"Didn't you not read that he provoke me  first, that is actually the wrong with you man! you! always looking the wrong that i've done but you did not see who made the first malicious thing!  "

I read his arguments about what happening in video which you posted. (and which is not yours)
you have no reason to be angry, all what you need to do is post your arguments.
Somebodys arguments and views is actualy usual thing on public forum. That is the simple consequences.
If you are not able to accept it, then you should not post the video.(mainly if you are not able to explain it)
and in first place,.... you should not be angry.
and when you mention who made first maliciou thing... you evidently forget who severaly times promised something and then violate it, and after that, just lauging others effort.
of course you have absolute right to do it, but...point is ....you should be able to withstand the consequences.

"is computation still needed?"
computation is universal language, by it, you can explain manny things very easily, and when you know numbers of some system you can easily recognize what is going on., and mainly, what will be.

"tesla already says the truth!"

what truth??? I know manny truths.... another thing pull-out from context.
and tesla mainly used computations. If you realy read the colorado spring notes as you said, then you shloud know what is computation good for.

"so you think tesla did it only for only 1M moment?"
No... I do not think so, you say that.

"i think your ego is more than your face!"
wel...I am not the one who compare himself with Tesla, bedini and others, I do not call myself capital,  you did.
I am not the one who is enjoying attentions.
I am not the one who is offended unreasonably.
I am not the one who says I have truth and others have not.(and not even bother to face others arguments)

i think i got your point ok?


first i am not enjoying attention ok especially yours.


second i cannot grant your request to give all the details ok.


even how much you denied about the malicious thing, we can see and feel it ok!.


and about the ego, you are not using it to a right gear ok.


and the discussion between you and me is nonsense so better for you to not posting here if it doesn't make help ok.
i think it is understood now!


anyhow thanks bro. 

[Tito L. Oracion]

Suppose two capacitors of C value initially charged at Q charges each one,(that is at V potential).

When capacitors are in parallel, the battery of 2*V waste Q charges to fill one capacitor, and other Q charges to fill the other at the same time. The capacitors rise to the same voltage as the battery (2*V).

Then you've got the capacitors charged at 2*V volts.

Now you disconnect the parallel.

Now you've got two C capacitors, each one charged at 2*Q. This means that each one of the disconnected capacitors have the same 2*V volts as the battery.

Now connect them in series. Now you've got 2*V volts of one 2*Q/C capacitor plus 2*V volts of the other 2*Q/C capacitor (series connection). That is 4*V.

They say that two series C capacitor are equal to C/2 because (in terms of voltage):

4*V = 2*Q/C + 2*Q/C = 4*Q/C = 2*Q/(C/2)

Now, it's clear that two C series capacitors at 4*V are the same as a unique C/2 capacitor at 4*V (but charged at half the charge!).

Why free energy?

Now, connect the series capacitors to the battery. The 4*V volts will be "dumped" into the battery. Then, the charges stored in the C capacitors will go to the battery, until the potential level of the series capacitors rise 2*V volts of the battery again.

Now, if you've got 2*V in the series connection, you must have V on each capacitor when you disconnect them. That means that each one of the capacitors is charged at V so the relation of charges is Q/C that is initial conditions.

SO YOU HAVE THE SAME CHARGES ON CAPACITORS THAN WHEN YOU STARTED THE CYCLE, SO THE CHARGES THE BATTERY GAVE ON PARALLEL CHARGING PROCCESS RETURN TO THE BATTERY ON SERIES DISCHARGING PROCCESS, so THE BATTERY DOES NEVER DISCHARGE.

Now only one method is missing 

[Magluvin]

Teets!   happy Thanksgiving. And to all.  ;]

Well Tito. I have to read it again.  ;]   looked good the first time.  ;]

Thanks Teets.

Mags