ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[WilbyInebriated]

That is just the effect of vibration of your first move.


Free energy is gaining steps or distance in a very close time.
and that means,  in those close time there are accumulation and collections.


always remember the snowball ok.

teets...   snowballs DON'T amplify energy... nor are they 'overunity'. and a snowball rolling down a hill doesn't amplify energy nor is it 'overunity'... even 'mr. hand' throwing a snowball at you doesn't amplify energy nor is it 'overunity'.

did you even make it past the first grade in school?

[Neo-X]

@Tito

Ang kaso d ko nga alam sikreto eh hehe.. Sabi mo may kulang pa dun sa mga sinabi ko. Pero kung gus2 mo sabihin mo nalang sakin ang sikreto para ako nalang ang gumawa tapos kung magtagumpay man edi gagawa ako ng marami tapos ibi2gay ko sau ng libre ang isa. Anu sapalagay mo magandang idea un diba?

[pix]

teets...   snowballs DON'T amplify energy... nor are they 'overunity'. and a snowball rolling down a hill doesn't amplify energy nor is it 'overunity'... even 'mr. hand' throwing a snowball at you doesn't amplify energy nor is it 'overunity'.

did you even make it past the first grade in school?

?
If you take into account, that a snow ball rolling down the hill is growing in mass and diameter- it's kinetic energy  grows for sure.
Regards,
Pix

[forest]

Wilby

Don't throw misconceptions, please. Snowabll effect is OU in pure sense. Check the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclined_plane

Now take a snowball attracting the snow during the roll down the hill......force is F = Gsin(alfa) where G = m*g , m = mass

Now is during the roll mass is changed then force is ENLARGED by some factor related to mass change and friction rise but I bet it is still more then initial force.
Proof : Tesla "My inventions"

Don't you think teachers should teach us REAL EXAMPLES instead of foolish theoretical, restricted knowledge ?


Tito, please stop talking in Philipinesse . What I wanted to tell you is that I'm working on second version of attracting ambient background , using pure resonance, not snowball effect.
My version is : kick and let vibrate freely, then collect vibrations of one or many receivers around. Like many tuning forks tuned to one frequency when one is radiating sound energy and all other are not loading the originator....

Friends , I want you all to think about the transformer schema :
Let's imagine hyphotetical  1:1 transformer which do not fail into the lenz law restrictions. One in which the energy in secondary is exact copy of energy in primary.

Here we see there is still a problem. We put 100W into primary and get 100W on secondary, but there is not much we gain because it is description of normal transformer, we only changed the thinking path from the energy transfer from primary to secondary, we imagined a copy of energy arised on secondary while primary is still pumped with 100W. Adding resistance looses into heat or RF we have now nothing more but still our inefficient transformer with just new theory of operation.....

Think about it.... there is more then one issue to resolve to complete task. Here we need not only lenz free system but also resonant circuit on at least primary side, and the way of controlling it. I see now 3 ways of doing the control , one of them is snowball effect.
Second is our normal impedance matching of power source to parallel resonance, third is the free oscillation.


But what still surprise me is that an ordinary tuning fork is showing all the time the magic we completly ignore... what is the source of vibrations ?

Do you know of any experiments using membrane or tuning fork or bells in vacuum and in outer space outside Earth magnetic/gravity fields ?? Can tuning fork vibrate in vacuum ?
I know that the reason for it is shape , elasticity and density of material but there is also ENERGY SOURCE giving kicks to allow long time run and a resonating chamber is also a clue suggesting that maybe the air has energy (heat ?) transferend to tuning fork...

So many marvels around we ignore....

[pix]

@forest
quote:Friends , I want you all to think about the transformer schema :
Let's imagine hyphotetical  1:1 transformer which do not fail into the lenz law restrictions
I would think, that every transformer or coil, pulsed via spark gap or other means, do not fail into Lenz law.
If you discharge capacitor, via spark gap to the primary of transformer ( sharp pulse), do you think that voltage and current flow, induced in secondary will have any efect on the primary?It is nonlinear process.
@Neo-X
Please, stop using your native language.It is an international forum.Use english.
Regards,
Pix