ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[d3x0r]

So how do coils transfer energy do they spin each others field or do their fields join.

1) compression/rarified waves in a linear motion... (hydraulic RAM figure sorta)
left arrow shows direction of flow; assuming non completely impeded flow where...
red and blue arrows show peeks of compresssion and rarification


2) below that is two conductors. Current is passing in the left, and it has a static blue circle field.


as the current increases, the compressed wave forces more magnetic force outwards that induces current in the near wire
as it goes to rarified state that influence diminishes... and eventually becomes a state to remove from the other side, which will cause a current in the other direction...


There is a hazy blue line that sort of outlines a curve that may be extended into dual vorticii..

the graph is shows with time expanded on the axis... really that line represents the same spacial point

[d3x0r]

dual vortexes...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr98n0cpztE  there is one that goes out the chamber floor, but there is another on the right side of this video that goes the opposite direction.  Off the bottom is where there are two vortexes (because the purple die is concentrated in the center) that form a helix... and rolling motion, which would help the vortex in the floor also maintain a rolling motion.
and also
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-J3pd1yyh7k (another ink demonstration)


note the double helix coming from the side channels...


Full explanation here in 3 parts


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlCW2lvacRE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjCJf8a5W9w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eNRRE2so-o

[d3x0r]

It might be helpful to note that we're dealing with moving electrons. 


The north field is always the same...


the resulting apparent field (which would be detectable by external means) on that core is the result of a current motion which is the result of an excess or deficit of near fields (particles)


two electrons moving in the same direction will still appear to have an electrostatic effect, because they will both have norths, and these will repel.  Two electrons moving in opposite directions still repel, because they still have two norths between them. 


a static charge is apparently not stable in a macro scale; but it is the monopole magnet.  a positive is wound oppositely from a negative, and at rest states their force is everywhere the same externally(?).


A moving charge stops being a monopole and becomes a dipole.  (heisenberg)... since we'd have to stop the motion to see if it is a charge, we can't know it was a dipole when it was moving, and if we allow it to move and be a dipole then we can't know if it is still an electrostatic.


so a moving charge near a static field (van de graff)... must be repelled.. but will probably be a significantly higher inertia (spin weight?) and result in disturbance of the at rest particles instead...

[d3x0r]

Considering near induction more...


There is this pulse when current changes... so somehow it's not 'smooth' as the longitudinal wave depicts, but does have sharp edges...


Tried to model current flow indicated by a graph sideways, but also the size of circle... and a near inductor ...


The down run of current is probably a result of the forward EMF... keeping the current moving in that conductor.. on both sides;

[a.king21]

You know, Tito,
I've just been looking at Otto's posts (The  late Otto).
That man is a hero and deserves our prayers.
I've replicated his first set up and am looking further.
Wouldn't  it be nice if someone who learnt from him could give a little back;
Just saying.