ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[a.king21]

Why Tito prefers Tesla's ozone patent to Tesla's igniter patent.


There is one fundamental difference in the ozone patent and it is this:


The ozone patent routes the power through the electric motor driving the circuit controller.


This has the effect of Stochastic mixing. The spark gap in the electric motor is adding
energy to the power already in the circuit.
Additionally by routing the power through the motor, it will not short if the motor should lose power because
the rest of the circuit will move the contacts on.
So the ozone patent is better.
Benitez talks about the same thing in his patents 100 years ago.


Nice one Tito.

[forest]

No, every Tesla patent show something new and only by combining it all you will see the whole picture.

[Cadman]

Thinking out load here.

Tito has said things like "very fast make/break" and "its the arrangement of capacitor discharging separate from the source to the coil" and "did you try discharging many caps sequentially on a coil? and charging them sequentially also?"

Also MileHigh explained here about back emf energy being the same as the energy put into a coil to energize it. http://www.overunity.com/12686/is-joule-thief-circuit-gets-overunity/msg345672/#msg345672

Now, what if... you pulse a coil with just enough energy to charge it, disconnect the charge source, send the back emf into a second coil, take the back emf from the second coil and send to a third coil, before reconnecting the charge source to the first coil, and repeat.

Could we not harvest energy from the magnetic field of all three coils?

[forest]

No, but I think you are closer...the theory is not a secret, Tesla said it in many places but indirectly....

[Cadman]

That was a mighty quick "No". Would you mind explaining why? Has anyone ever tried it?