ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Google]

 

[jbignes5]

 One final comment then back to my studies.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMFPe-DwULM&list=PL04B3F5636096478C


This is the way most tackle the thing they do not understand. Even when some have tried to explain by real examples (experiments). They tend to ignore others attempts to explain even when they are asking why or what is happening. This is the fundamental problem we all face in this field. They only look to what they have experienced as to the explanation and not look to experiments showing otherwise. When it violates what they have learned previously they resort to thinking how it could be done by fraud instead of the way presented. Yes in some cases there has been fraud but as most have seen here fraud only results from being proven it is fraud, not by merely suggesting a way it could be fraud.


Most think matter is solid. Well you couldn't be further from the truth. All matter is not solid, thats a fact. It is the spooky action at a distance that is the one true fact! What is in between is the answer. Since all matter has space in-between, it is the in-between that holds the secret! Whatever this in-between is should be the question and since everything has this in between it is a very very important discovery that some have explored. This includes Tesla among some very prominent thinkers. Tesla found out more about the in-between then any other because he experimented and learned how to move this in-between and found a way to receive this movement through intensity. The movement also is much related to density of the in-between and it's variations and how to vary it through intensity.


Take it for what it is,
jbignes5

[From other Planet]

Google, I want give u one more hint: the more aggression and hate u show towards others, the less they will want to help u building a working device... 

[wattsup]

@jbignes5

If you are interested in learning about how I see the world of electricity which is definitely not your standard method, I openly put up the starter doc here;

http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Wattsups%27%20stuff/theoreticals/

This is just the beginning for me as eventually I need to get that document expanded.

When Feynman talked about the big generator turning and this makes other generators turn in the city, for me this is what I have called Spin Conveyance (SC) because that is exactly what it is. He just has skimmed the issue without knowing it. As in the small, as in the large. The big image of a fractal is the same as the smallest image in the fractal. Nothing changes but the scale.

SC would explain all electrical phenomena as per their present formulas and it is much more intuitive for the human mind then trying to learn the present "electron flow" while asking and asking "Yes but why?" and always getting the answer "Because that's the way it is", just like he said himself.

In the micro sense, to know what electricity is you really have to go in fact back to that one gigantic generator because that's where it all starts for man. Don't start at your wall plug. That's not where it comes from. hahaha

To know the origin of what really electricity is, you still have to go back technically even further to understand why the hell atoms exist in the first place. That one common denominator between all mass in the universe, mass that seems dead to us but is in fact alive and spinning, all has one simple rule. I had  pondered that question for years now. So what is that rule? In my eyes it is this. Movement. How does it move. The first movement was the Big Bang that started the race for all the galaxies and all that is in them. The rule is that if you can speed up your movement fast enough, you become mass with electrons, otherwise, you are to slow and you are just matter, which is dead electron-less nuclei without any electrons. As an analogy, you go from a nucleus that has no electrons which is "matter" at let's say the size of a pin head, and then at a certain critical speed of movement through the universal ether, that pin head attracts electrons and becomes an atom the size of a basketball.

Anyways if you are interested in knowing where I come from on this subject, I at least put it all out there and that is the basis of all my works. That's how I see things these days and not as most see things as they were taught in school.

When others look to see electron flow, I look to see Spin Conveyance. I will still explain effects in the standard sense because I know that know one will understand anything else. hahaha

So for me my major dilemma is what do I do? Do I spend time explaining SC while knocking my brains out trying to turn already concrete filled minds that are set in their ways, or do I spend my time working on OU to at least try and bring free energy to the world ASAP. Right now I am on the later and really hope this OU will be disclosed by me or anyone else, I don't really care about that, but when that happens, I will be free to then explain SC and why free energy is not only now possible but in fact here and this time, here to stay.

wattsup

PS: But I also have learned another thing during my number of years on the forum. This type of discourse is not useful in a true thread working towards OU. In a thread dedicated to fooling around like this one, hehehe (kudos to @teets and gang), you could talk about anything, but in a real OU thread, you should not interject in them with anything else but what is directly related to the cause.

[jbignes5]

I really didn't want to get into yet another discussion on this subject in this thread.


I don't have an issue with you or the way you see thing. FYI

Your vision is quite like mine.