ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[jbignes5]

I had thought I made myself clear but I will answer based on the way the question was presented (with respect).


The electric component is the source network. It maintains it's potential by being connected to the network established by the medium the matter displaces. The more displacement the more and the stronger this effect can be seen. Currents arise out of this displacement when two sources come together or connect to the network. Mind you most of the connections happens a very long time ago and you could think of it like this. In the uniformity of space after the event that created the space energy or particles condensed out of that uniformity. It would be like watching a dye in water in reverse time. From the point of saturation of the dye in the water if we roll back time on the video we can see the condensing action as an example. Except in this case it was forming little balls. These litlle balls would take more zero's then I would care to post to count in just a square cubic centimeters volume.


As the condensing network works it creates differences in the flows between this network. This is done by multiple network connections and is highly dependant on that for current flow.


I think Ed was right but then again not exactly right, what is the genesis of the magnetic field? The ELECTRIC field.
The magnetic field is conservative is it not? Then how could the magnetic field support itself if it is trying to conserve itself? It is gaining something from the electric field inside of the magnets atoms. Little channels are being created and the magnetic force is being enhanced by that channel of electric field between each atom. This creates a stiffening and a focusing of the magnetic streams in between each atom. It stays that way because of the atoms mix and the atoms ability to have phase changes due to heat. When the atoms cool they become stable enough to maintain the streams without power. This is a loop at that point. The electrical field is 90 degrees out of phase of the magnetic field lines so to speak and the relationship stays the same as what we see in the real world larger applications.


So the simple answer is the Electric field is the initiator of current. When current starts to flow it is dictated by the electric field as to the flow direction. This current allows the magnetic field to form around the current flows as eddies in the case of the wire analogy.. And that is it. Plain and simple.

[Jeg]

Just clear your mind and consider this.... What do you think? That's where theory is need it. I am sure that Jbigness will agree on this as current flow is based on the potential difference between two points... the direction is from higher to lower and this is a universal law.


Tnks
Jeg

[jbignes5]

 I would add a gap in between the cap and ground.


"Again in Fig. 19 two transmitting circuits, one grounded directly and the other thru an air gap are shown. It is a common observation that the former is far more effective, which could not be the case with Hertz radiations. In a like manner if two grounded circuits are observed from day to day the effect is found to increase greatly with the dampness of the ground, and for the same reason also the transmission thru sea-water is more efficient."


http://www.tfcbooks.com/images/articles/1919-05-00/19.jpg


Now remember me telling of the spark gap as an open capacitor that is allowed to break down.


"An illuminating experiment is indicated in Fig. 20 in which two grounded transmitters are shown, one with a large and the other with a small terminal capacity. Suppose that the latter be 1/10 of the former but that it is charged to 10 times the potential and let the frequency of the two circuits and therefore the currents in both antennas be exactly the same. The circuit with the smaller capacity will then have 10 times the energy of the other but the effects on the receiver will be in no wise proportionate."

http://www.tfcbooks.com/images/articles/1919-05-00/20.jpg

Lets ask what the new scientists say on my thoughts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IdMz8PkGZM

[Jeg]

You are  a real gem. Continue your good work and there are many people that appreciate it.

Thanks
Jeg

[Google]

Uncle JB ! Thanks , now you opened yourself up and shared good knowledge. Sorry I had to make you a bit uncomfortable to dig. You make sense to me. Uncle, the only problem remains is that whether charge comes first or voltage. Egg or chichen first ??

I still believe there can be no voltage without electrical Efield due to charge. Charge comes from atomic particles. So voltage is ultimately an atomic phenomenon.

Its the atomic forces running the universe.

A sustained voltage is needed for current to flow. If voltage dies after current flow, no more work can be done. Like I have 10,000 volts static in my comb on dry days but it cant kill me.

We are actually looking for a sustainable HV field to do overunity meaningful work.

With due respect to your age, I am a 15.5 year old student of M.Phil Chemistry and not a troll. I do respect your age Uncle JB.

If overunity happens it should be simple to understand. One should not be forced to learn a new set of rules again. Oh no. Not again !

Keep up the good work.