Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

Started by Tito L. Oracion, February 06, 2009, 01:45:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 47 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jeg

Quote from: Dave45 on June 29, 2014, 10:47:05 AM
Hey Jeg there's no switch between pos and ground through the coil.
Looks like switch B will charge C1 then switch A will discharge C1 but C2 and pos terminal will take the hit.
Just my take there are those that are more qualified to read the circuit.

When switch B is activated then C1 will be charged while the same time the other cap is charging straight from the DC pwr supply. When Switch A is activated then both caps are in series and both voltages in sum exceed the threshold point of zener and discharge through coil. Power supply can not be harmed due to diodes.
At least this is the main concept. Perhaps mosfets have to be substituted with relays or thyristors. 

Dave45

Hey Jeg you may be right, just my take.
Give it a shot, let us know how it works out.
I hope it works "charging in parallel and discharging in series" has me stumped.


Jeg

Quote from: Dave45 on June 29, 2014, 11:38:30 AM
Hey Jeg you may be right, just my take.
Give it a shot, let us know how it works out.
I hope it works "charging in parallel and discharging in series" has me stumped.

I will report on this when i'll find some time to play around. In the meanwhile, if anyone will find other way please share it.
Thanks 

Reiyuki

Quote from: Jeg on June 29, 2014, 11:46:19 AM
I will report on this when i'll find some time to play around. In the meanwhile, if anyone will find other way please share it.
Thanks


'Charging in parallel, discharge in series' is talking about the coils more than the caps.

Two identical coils are energized in parallel (opposed bucking configuration).
Two other coils in series provide the output.  All on the same core.

The opposed coils creates the compression field, series output provides the bias field and output.



Bob Smith

Quote from: Reiyuki on June 29, 2014, 08:36:21 PM

'Charging in parallel, discharge in series' is talking about the coils more than the caps.

Two identical coils are energized in parallel (opposed bucking configuration).
Two other coils in series provide the output.  All on the same core.

The opposed coils creates the compression field, series output provides the bias field and output.
Yes! Each of the wires wound parallel in the coil is energized by a pulse.  The more wires in parallel energized by the pulse, the greater the sum voltage. What do you think, Reiyuki -
- are the 2 ends of each parallel wire fed into an Avramenko plug,
- or might one end of each parallel wire be left open as a kind of antenna, while the other end leads to a diode and then joined with other parallel wires, dumping into a series discharge arrangement (coils/caps)?
- or perhaps some other variation?
Bob