ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[bringdownthezog]

Belief is based on evidence.
Faith does not require evidence.
Bearden et al do not supply evidence.

Bearden was about to go intro production with the MEG. But the company that produced the cores was bought out by Hewlett Packard and the facility was moved from LA to Haryana on the other side of the planet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3bVUr5nHaM

[citfta]

Over the past 10 years or so I have seen several attempts by people to build a working MEG.  None of them were successful.  And watching YouTube videos about free energy devices is just about as useful as reading comic books about your favorite action hero.  It's entertaining but totally worthless.

[F6FLT]

This puny F6FLT  thinks he knows energy transfer and Tesla!!!!!  The scam of the century!!!

Of course I know. All Tesla's patents concerning electricity are based on conventional electromagnetism, they are perfectly understood today and were quickly understood even in Tesla's time when it was new. His inventiveness was really great, he was a genious of invention, but everyone with an engineering background as Tesla had, understands his work.

He failed in energy transfer because beyond short distances of the order of wavelength, coupling between transmitter and receiver is not sufficient, there are also many losses in surrounding conductors such as earth, and increasing the wavelength is not mechanically possible because it involves also increasing the dimensions of the radiating elements in proportion, to keep the same efficiency. He was a much better engineer than a physicist.

Unlike Tesla, Bearden is as useless in engineering as he is in physics. His "MEG" is of a confusing stupidity, he denies the principles of field superposition in parametric configuration, and therefore, no one has ever been able to produce any MEG that works.

It's funny how many people have made Tesla their god of electricity. Unlike Tesla, who studied at the Austrian Polytechnic in Graz and passed more exams than necessary, they have not done any academic study, they understand almost nothing about electrical engineering, they believe they are facing great mysteries and secrets, and they tempt to explain them with magic thinking, such as prehistoric men who would be shown a smartphone.   These guys are an insult to Tesla's memory.

[partzman]

Unlike Tesla, Bearden is as useless in engineering as he is in physics. His "MEG" is of a confusing stupidity, he denies the principles of field superposition in parametric configuration, and therefore, no one has ever been able to produce any MEG that works.

I have to disagree here.  Back when the MEG was first introduced, I talked with Bearden and members of his team as an interested replicator.  I found them quite knowledgeable and willing to discuss the device to a point, but due to patent applications at that time, certain info was not discussed.  Anyway, I proceeded to build a MEG like arrangement which did produce excess energy.

My device was based on a pair of AMCC-320 amorphous "C" cores, used MOV's for loads, and had a rather modest PM structure for core bias.  Removal of the PM structure did affect the gain of the device.

The secondaries were wound on the cores in a directional manner in that all layers were wound in the same direction with a single wire returning to the start position of the next layer.  This cuts the voltage stress in half between layers as compared to normal layer winding and was done to minimize breakdown in the secondaries due to the high resonant peak AC voltages.

Simultaneous input and output measurements were taken with a Voltech PM3000 3-phase power analyzer with the MEG device operating at ~30kHz.  Due to the MOV loads, the output voltage and current waveforms were highly non-linear and reactive.  The measurement of these waveforms was easily handled by the PM3000 which did indicate a COP>1.

I ran many tests with this MEG variant using various loads, etc, until the secondaries finally broke down and I never felt the need to rebuild it as I had the info I was seeking.  BTW, it was very difficult and time consuming to wind the secondaries.

Pm 

[densama]

Belief is based on evidence. Faith does not require evidence.
Bearden et al do not supply evidence.

if we need an evidence ... why have faith ?
If we loose faith, the SPIKE automatically shut down

most important is following SPIKE of thought and
the SPIKE take unidirectional road straight in ...

oh ... my English ... why i get SPIKE everyday here