ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[partzman]

I have built and tested this device, and I am not alone. It doesn't work, and I understand perfectly why it doesn't work.
If yours works, show it to us and have it tested by an independent team.

"lack of understanding"!   It is becoming painful, all those people who believe and claim that this flawed thing work, who give pretentious and insulting lessons from their ignorance, without ever being able in the 16 years since the patent was filed, to present us with a device that works! This is ridiculous. Stop wasting our time. I'm not a gullible religious believer.

Do I have to add that work must be produced to make a parametric change that allows to get extra-energy, and that therefore there is no energy gain in the process? Of course, it's not necessary, these guys are not here to understand but to constantly repeat their acts of faith.

I have a suggestion.  Why not use your previous MEG setup and test it with MOV loads.  I've been searching thru my old files and logs and have not yet found my notes from that period but I did find that JLN's website did have some info that I posted there years ago.  This can be found at-

http://jnaudin.free.fr/meg/megnot01.htm

Here you will find the exact MOVs I used and some of my thots and opinions on the device.  As I recall, I did attempt to loop the device in many configurations without success and since then I've learned that because a device exhibits a COP>1 from a measurement standpoint, does not mean a stand alone "generator" can be built.

Pm

[leonelogb]

You know why???     

]

Always said its the extra coil. Eight times as great.

https://ibb.co/jRZsnq

PS: I cant post this circuit on this site no matter how much I try. You are free to try yourself! 

[Magluvin]

Hmm.  been thinking this week as to what I could come up with as variations of bifi coils that could avoid the issue of resistance....
If we want more capacitance, then we need more turns, thus more resistance.  So Ive been, Hmmmm..
lets say we have a bifi coil that is 1H and a capacitance of 15uf.  Just an example...  It would ring about 41hz...
Now, if we put another identical bifi in parallel, we should double our capacitance!!!!! But we reduce inductance by what, Half?

So I went to Circuit sim to look at some things....
I used the default circuit which has a 1H inductor with a 15uf cap which rings at 41hz. Then I added another 1H coil in parallel with the original, with a switch to switch out the second inductor when needed. With the second coil switch on the oscillation went to 58hz Hmmm, if the induction was halved, thats not a crazy increase. Might have thought it to be more like 82hz, like 41x2.  But there is one thing to change which is the 15uf cap to 30 uf. Now we are back to our original 41hz!!!   This I think is a great thing!!! More bifi coils in parallel, same resonant freq but we halve the resistance with every doubling of bifi coils. Now there is another aspect that will have to be tried.....
Say we have 8 bifi coils in parallel connection, would there be any advantages to having the coils set in different positions to one another,  such as in close proximity, say inline, or to space them away from each other.


Gotta git. got more on this.  Just let the possibilities of this sink in a bit. 
Mags

[ayeaye]

You tell us why its not working. We might as well enjoy your imaginary experiments.

F6FLT saying that he built something, usually means that he tried to simulate something remotely similar, but it failed. In spite his criticism of others may sometimes be right, he excessively used to condemn others, and he is apparently stranger to the scientific rigor what concerns doing experiments.

[bringdownthezog]

You know why???     

Tito and Leonelogb. Are you using high side switching ?