ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[lancaIV]

I showed as example the 10 meters coil to 10x 1 meter coils cut and the EE calculation and use "problem" .


We would be stupid to do such an act,complicating the voltage and current stream !


But : there are two types of connection and array construction ,a . serial b. parallel  Voltage-amplifying          Amperage-amplifying

                                                                                                                       V-         diminuation        A-           diminuation


      to the third : serial and parallel






An 1,2,.... 10,(and more) parallel coil/-s connection idea


https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=69&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20070201&CC=JP&NR=2007028879A&KC=A


decription in european language

http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=JP&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=2007028879&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=ja&TRGLANG=en

conditioning :

[0004]

If the voltage is stable, the parallel resistance can increase the current without increasing the voltage. Since the electric power is current x voltage, the electric power can also be increased. Is a device that can easily increase power by n times, which saves input power in terms of cost.

https://brilliant.org/wiki/ohms-law-microscopic-interpretation/#:~:text=Microscopically%2C%20Ohm's%20law%20is%20a,J%20%E2%83%97%20%3D%20%CF%83%20E%20%E2%83%97%20.&text=In%20the%20above%20equation%2C%20%CF%83,current%20density%20at%20a%20point.


                                    Ohm related Mho,  1/resistance or 1/Ohm =  SIEMENS  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siemens_(unit)





Amplifying or diminuation of EMF,clearer EMFF to EFF AND MFF  and counter BEFF and BMFF


                          light(particle)-wave-dualism(flash and thunder) :


                               Electric Force = V -Field = V/m


                               Magnetic Force =A -Field = A/m


                               and reciproke : B- (or negative-/counter-/.....)


                  classical EE-language design for physical phenomens : for example


                  https://www.wordsense.eu/motere/ 


                 moto I set in motion
                         I keep moving



                                   motere : moto : MOTOR                  MOTORIK






                                   differing :    https://de.pons.com/%C3%BCbersetzung/latein-deutsch/notare


                                                          NOTAR             NOTORIK  ( neuronal para-/sympathikus to solar plexus)


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notorisch








Annalen der Physik-language ,deutsch :  EMK and MMK   Elektro-Motorische-Kraft       Magneto-Motorische-Kraft


                                                            to EMKF and MMKF  F=Feld/Field


                                                            K=Kraft/Force and KF = Kraft-Feld/Force-Field


                                                            counter/Gegen- : GEMK and GMMK


                                 For this all we have the stringent/strength to differ and use formulas !




           and for example to know/noto that GEMK is not spoken "Gemk" but "Gegenelektromotorische Kraft"




          alike to speak out : LASER the "word"-user should know that it is an abbreviation :  from L.A.S.E.R

           Akronym , english       light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation


          M.A.S.E.R.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maser microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation







                            Physician and Engineer and Technician : they should speak and write and work by same principle


                                                                1 image or 1000 words 


                                                                            1:1       


                                                                     =      1




    We should ,probably, also calculate -by acceleration/amplifying- deceleration/diminuation the GRAVITATIONAL FORCE /FIELD change


                                                        electron magneton graviton


   counter : LEICHT LEVE LEVITATIONAL




                               This all seems complicated : But from Tesla-T.T.Brown R&D stage to 2021 : 


                               serial and parallel angstrom- thin layer cell/modul converter in multiple stack as "battery"




                              billions of nano-coils to nano-LCR circuits (= emitter/receptor/amplifier =receiver) per sqm layer
                     
                              this in nano-small :   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMfAotrPEkI  2:20




                              1 circuit/cycle system = 1 particle = 1 dot to 1 quantum dot


                               https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/materials-science/quantum-dot

                              Quantum dots (QDs) are semiconductor nanoparticles which exhibit size and composition-dependent optical and electronic (optoelectronic) properties. QDs are ultrasmall, typically falling in the size range between 1.5 and 10.0 nm.

                  compared 1 human hair : https://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/nano-size#:~:text=There%20are%2025%2C400%2C000%20nanometers%20in,approximately%2080%2C000%2D%20100%2C000%20nanometers%20wide



                             excitons-hunter/trap


                             https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/exciton


                              this is called solar-cell-array or Photo-Voltaic generator and in combination with


                                                                  Phono-Voltaic :


                                                                  Thermionic converter


                                        " noise-to-signal/signal-to-noise or cps or flops"  as velocity denomination


                                 
                                         f.l.o.p.s. : Floating_Point_Operations_Per_Second


                                         to differ from        experiment flop  or       life flop




Am I strict in my life,Leely ? Yes,pardon-me for the wrong written conversation word : " ..... reely,Leely ..." ,correct " .... really,Leely ..."!?


EE-Volt to atomic = quantum spectrum eV


https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elektronenvolt


             

[Leely]

I'm meant to believe that the amplifier side is built with components from an already published diagram, of which two components (e.g. A and C) have been interchanged or replaced by false components. But I have not been told the particular published diagram.

[lancaIV]

I'm meant to believe that the amplifier side is built with components from an already published diagram, of which two components (e.g. A and C) have been interchanged or replaced by false components. But I have not been told the particular published diagram.

Are You referring #8791





Dave45 is the best!   Tito is       Love!

http://realstrannik.ru/forum/77-temy-ot-fantom/135067-tankodrom.html?start=252#259200
Electrons ... electrons ... don't bother.
Take a ferromagnetic bar with two windings, stick magnets on the sides so that the bar enters
saturation.  We feed the emf in the direction in such a way that the current creates a magnetic field opposite to the
field of magnets and core.  In this case, the primary has an inductive resistance, in which it occurs
a voltage drop, or rather voltage radiation to space.  Space responds: its voltage is already
"precipitated, trapped", induced in the secondary, a current arises.  The secondary current will create a magnetic field
codirectional with the field of magnets and core.  This means that there is no inductive resistance for the secondary current.

   

We send the secondary in its entirety.  Whatever the current in the secondary, for the primary, the inductive resistance as it was,
it will continue to be so.  Magnets and core - medium, voltage primary - space activator (modulator), secondary - drain.
Too simple, and therefore it does not fit in the head.  But for this to work, you need a small shamanic tambourine, you need to hit it once to "enchant" the core.   




related " ..... of which two components (e.g. A and C) have been interchanged or replaced by false components ....." ?




Sincere


OCWL

[Leely]

I'm meant to believe again that the device tito built was gotten from a journal, chapter two, the drawing is located at the top of the page.
Moreover, the clues tito gave, made me to find hints which other free energy researchers gave. It made me know that free energy machines are not difficult to build, you needed the right hints from the free energy author to start with.

[onepower]

Leely

I'm meant to believe again that the device tito built was gotten from a journal, located at the top of the page, in a particular chapter. And it was clearly written in the first page of the journal that not all drawings in the journal are correct. It seems someone who created the journal wanted people to get some free energy from it because of the way the drawings were presented differently than the way other publishers presented theirs. It seems tito presented to you drawings from other journals, not from that journal, making it difficult for you to locate the loopholes.
And again, tito used clues which are normally in free energy machines to explain the device, which he would have used hints. For example, it's like telling you, you're looking for a car that has a tire, windshield, automatic gear. All cars have tyre, or windshield, some have automatic gear. He should have told you the name of the car, the shape of the car, or even the type of engine it is running. In other words, tito doesn't want you to find the device in what he is saying.

No, the technology was gotten from Tesla, Moray, Figurea, Hendershot, Schauberger and other great minds and it all comes down to a series of basic questions...

What is energy, where is it, why is it?
What is a field, why does it exist, where does it come from?.

If you cannot answer these basic questions then you cannot understand free energy and the odds of attaining it are basically zero.

It works like this my friend, do not judge the person, there language or any other superficial artifacts but only the concept they present. As Tito claimed this is a high voltage phenomena, thus if you cannot or will not put in the effort to understand it then your out of luck. The onus is on you not people like him and if you cannot rise to the occasion then we all understand the consequences of these actions.

Regards
AC