New youtube of magnet/coil "perpetual motion"

[MileHigh]

The real joke is that the reveal itself is a hoax.  It's a hoax sitting on top of a hoax.

There is something very sobering and ironic in all of this.  First you hoax people.  And then you do a reveal that itself is a hoax, where you are ostensibly giving yourself back your credibility as a classicist, and all of the doubters are pleased to see that they were right and the believers do a doubletake.  But you are really testing people a second time - a doublecross - and now everybody is hoaxed.

MileHigh

[Hugo Chavez]

@Sterling,
Actually it wasnt a Hoax more of a lesson. When I wrote to him privately suggesting what he had done is was very open and honest about it. This was when it first appeared. Kudos to him as it was a teaching exercise. I am sad it took so long for so many people to learn the lesson.
It is always interesting to study human behaviour here, I think thats why I keep comming back. There are some very smart people here, but sadly a few not so smart who believe anything as they want to believe.
I will stick to my scientific rules and methodology, it has served well over the years.
Kind Regards
Mark
PS I am still testing devices and working with a few inventors still...there is always hope.
Mark

did he tell you about the lies he left in his comment section to lead people to believe it was absolutely legit?  He then removed his own comment when he made his reveal.  He led people to believe there was no trickery and something to do with the coil configuration that made it work.  Now if it was a lesson, you would be given the correct set of factors from the start.  Once you introduce lies... well...  It became another lesson that was meant to teach people they could be suckered.  Those lessons are a penny a dozen on the net and this was just one of those.  a hoax meant to teach that lesson, a lesson we don't need any more of, thanks.

[markdansie]

@Hugo
you make a good point, I guess I have to agree to a large extent. There are many Hoaxes, too many, and many more self delusional. I do admire the many who continue to reaseach and explore the boundries but are grounded enough to really know what their results demonstrate.
Kind Regards
Mark